[205] The speeches on this occasion were published by Helene Stöcker in her pamphlet, “The Association for the Protection of Mothers” (No. 4 of “Modern Questions of the Day,” edited by Dr. Hans Landsberg; Berlin, 1905). [206] Unfortunately, Ruth Bré, who has played such a leading part in the history of the movement for the protection of mothers and for sexual reform, has recently gone her own way, and has founded an association of her own for the protection of mothers, which we may hope will soon be reabsorbed into the general Association. Above all, in such a province of reform as this, open as it is to attacks of every kind, unity is essential. [207] Helene Stöcker, “Die Liebe und die Frauen”--“Love and Women” (Minden, 1906). [208] Fr. Naumann, “Women in the New Economic Life,” published in _Mutterschutz_, 1906, No. 4, pp. 133-149. [209] W. Borgius, “Mutterschafts-Rentenversicherung,” _ibid._, pp. 149-154. [210] Lily Braun, “Die Mutterschaftsversicherung,” _ibid._, 1906, Nos. 1-3, pp. 18-24, 69-76, 110-124. [211] M. Lischnewska, “The Economic Reform of Marriage,” _ibid._, No. 6, pp. 215-236. [212] H. Fürth, “Motherhood and Marriage,” _ibid._, 1905, Nos. 7, 10-12, pp. 165-169, 389-395, 427-435, 483-489. [213] The facts to which we have alluded throw a peculiar light upon the ever-renewed attack, made by certain writers who will not see, _against_ the emancipation of women, whilst at the same time they _advocate_ motherhood! A typical example of this is the book written by the gynecologist Max Runge, “Woman in her Sexual Individuality” (Berlin, 1896), the objectivity of which, in comparison with other hostile writings, must, however, be expressly recognized. [214] “Office Consultations of a Solicitor,” by Severserenus, p. 70 _et seq._ (Hanover, 1902).