Collier's folio makes a natural and obvious correction, reading '_so_ fairly.' The usual reading is that of Steevens, a transposition of 'peeps' and 'fairly,' and I have retained it. * * * * * "Nothing she does or seems But smacks of something greater than herself." Here again the same folio makes the correction _says_ for 'seems'; yet it is not very necessary. * * * * * "He tells her something That makes her blood look on it." This is probably the genuine text; but '_w_akes her blood. Look on it!' the reading of Collier's folio, is very plausible. It is strange that neither Singer nor Dyce notice this reading. They read with Theobald 'look _out_.' * * * * * "Pray _you_, good shepherd, what fair swain is this, That dances with your daughter?-- They call him Doricles, and _he_ boasts himself To have a worthy feeding. I have it but Upon his own report, and I believe it." Steevens, quoting passages from Drayton, explains 'feeding' in the sense of pasture, and Mason explains 'worthy' as valuable, substantial; but neither is convincing. I would, with Hanmer, read 'breeding:' "A gentleman, I do assure myself, And of a _worthy breeding_, though he hide it." Fletcher, Monsieur Thomas, i. 1. In reading 'I have it but' for 'but I have it' of the folio, I am supported by Hunter and Singer. * * * * * "Who loves another best." Hanmer and Mason would read '_the_ other,' and so we should say now; but there is no need of change. It was, in fact, the language of the time; we should still say, "they love one another." * * * * * "Come, buy of me, come _buy_, come buy, come buy! Buy lads, or else your lasses cry. Come buy!" * * * * * "Clamour your tongues and not a word more."