The sidereal messenger of Galileo Galilei : $b and a part of the preface to Kepler's Dioptrics containing the original account of Galileo's astronomical discoveriesGalilei, Galileo
History
The sidereal messenger of Galileo Galilei : $b and a part of the preface to Kepler's Dioptrics containing the original account of Galileo's astronomical discoveries
Galilei, Galileo
Astronomy -- Early works to 1800; Jupiter (Planet) -- Satellites
For the sake of being more easily understood, I will suppose a tube A
B C D.[7] Let E be the eye of the observer; then, when there are no
lenses in the tube rays from the eye to the object F G would be drawn
in the straight lines E C F, E D G, but when the lenses have been
inserted, let the rays go in the bent lines E C H, E D I,—for they are
contracted, and those which originally, when unaffected by the lenses,
were directed to the object F G, will include only the part H I. Hence
the ratio of the distance E H to the line H I being known, we shall
be able to find, by means of a table of sines, the magnitude of the
angle subtended at the eye by the object H I, which we shall find to
contain only some minutes. But if we fit on the lens C D thin plates
of metal, pierced, some with larger, others with smaller apertures, by
putting on over the lens sometimes one plate, sometimes another, as may
be necessary, we shall construct at our pleasure different subtending
angles of more or fewer minutes, by the help of which we shall be
able to measure conveniently the intervals between stars separated by
an angular distance of some minutes, within an error of one or two
minutes. But let it suffice for the present to have thus slightly
touched, and as it were just put our lips to these matters, for on
some other opportunity I will publish the theory of this instrument in
completeness.
[7] [Illustration]
The line C H in Galileo’s figure represents the small pencil of
rays from H which, after refraction through the telescope, reach
the eye E. The enlarged figure shows that if O P be the radius of
the aperture employed, the point H of the object would be just
outside the field of view. The method, however, is at best only
a very rough one, as the boundary of the field of view in this
telescope is unavoidably indistinct.
Now let me review the observations made by me during the two months
just past, again inviting the attention of all who are eager for true
philosophy to the beginnings which led to the sight of most important
phenomena.
[Sidenote: The Moon. Ruggedness of its surface. Existence of lunar
mountains and valleys.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account