The Silent Watchers: England's Navy during the Great War: What It Is, and What We Owe to ItCopplestone, Bennet
History
The Silent Watchers: England's Navy during the Great War: What It Is, and What We Owe to It
Copplestone, Bennet
Great Britain. Royal Navy; World War, 1914-1918 -- Naval operations
“You have forgotten the _Invincible_,” remarked that candid critic whom
I have called Salt Horse. “She took station at the head of Beatty’s line
at 6.21. Her distance from the enemy was then 8,000 yards. It was a
gallant service, for Beatty needed support very badly, but by 6.55 the
_Invincible_ had been destroyed. The _Iron Duke_ passed her floating
bottom up. She must have been caught by the concentrated fire of several
enemy ships. It was a piece of luck for Fritz; the last that he had.
Apart from the downing of the _Invincible_, I agree that the third part
of the battle showed our gunnery to be highly effective, and that of the
Germans to be almost wholly innocuous. It was his torpedoes we had then
to fear, not his guns.”
“During the third part,” said the Maker, “the ranges were comparatively
low, from 9,000 to 12,000 yards, but the visibility was so bad that
damaged ships could always betake themselves out of sight and danger. I
am disposed to think that most of Fritz’s sorely damaged ships did get
home—in the absence of evidence that they did not—for we never really
closed in during the whole of the third part of the battle. Fritz was
continually coming and going, appearing and disappearing. His destroyer
attacks were well delivered, and though one battleship only was hit, our
friend the _Marlborough_, we were kept pretty busy looking after
ourselves. Jellicoe was like a heavy-weight boxer trying to get home
upon a little man, skipping about just beyond his reach. We had the
speed and the guns and the superiority of position, but we couldn’t see.
That is the explanation of the indecisiveness of the third part of the
Jutland battle, that part which, with decent luck, would have ended
Fritz’s business. Our gunnery was then top-hole. Take the typical case
of the flagship _Iron Duke_. She got a sight of a _Koenig_ at 12,000
yards (seven miles), straddled her at once, and began to hit at the
second salvo. That is real gunnery, not much waste about it either of
time or shell. Then towards sunset the _Lion_, _Princess Royal_, and
_New Zealand_ engaged two battleships and two battle cruisers at 10,000
yards. Within eighteen minutes three of the Germans had been set on
fire, two were listing heavily, and the three burning ones were only
saved by becoming hidden in smoke and mist. That is the way to get on to
a target and to hold on. I agree with our old friend Salt Horse that the
long ranges during the first part of the action, 18,000 to 20,000
yards—and even more for the _Queen Elizabeth_—are altogether too long
for accuracy unless the conditions are perfect. The distances are well
within the power of the big-calibre guns which we mount, but are out of
harmony with the English naval spirit. We like to see our enemy
distinctly and to get within real punishing distance of him. Compare our
harmless performance during the first part with the beautiful whacking
which we gave Fritz in the third whenever we could see him. The nearer
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account