The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 1 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning — John Shaqi
The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 1 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning Proclus
Philosophy
The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 1 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning
Proclus
Neoplatonism -- Early works to 1800; Plato -- Early works to 1800; Theology -- Early works to 1800
I confess I am wholly at a loss to conceive what could induce the
moderns to controvert the dogma, that the stars and the whole world are
animated, as it is an opinion of infinite antiquity, and is friendly
to the most unperverted, spontaneous, and accurate conceptions of the
human mind. Indeed, the rejection of it appears to me to be just as
absurd as it would be in a maggot, if it were capable of syllogizing,
to infer that man is a machine impelled by some external force when he
walks, because it never saw any animated reptile so large.
The sagacious Kepler, for so he is called even by the most modern
writers,[10] appears to have had a conception of this great truth; but
as he was more an astronomer than a philosopher, he saw this truth
only partially, and he rather embraced it as subservient to his own
astronomical opinions, than as forming an essential part of the true
theory of the universe. But from what I have of the writings of Kepler,
I have no doubt, if he had lived in the time of the Greeks, or if he
had made the study of the works of Plato and Aristotle the business
of his life, he would have become an adept in, and an illustrious
and zealous champion of their philosophy. Kepler then (in Harmonices
Mundi, lib. 4, p. 158) says, “That he does not oppose the dogma, that
there is a soul of the universe, though he shall say nothing about it
in that book. He adds, that if there is such a soul, it must reside
in the centre of the world, which, according to him, is the sun, and
from thence by the communication of the rays of light, which are in
the place of spirits in an animated body, is propagated into all
the amplitude of the world.”[11] In the following passages also he
confidently asserts that the earth has a soul. For he says, “That the
globe of the earth is a body such as is that of some animal; and that
what its own soul is to an animal, that the sublunary nature which he
investigates will be to the earth.”[12] He adds, “That he sees for
the most part every thing which proceeding from the body of an animal
testifies that there is a soul in it, proceeds also from the body of
the earth. For as the animated body produces in the superficies of
the skin hairs, thus also the earth produces [on its surface] plants
and trees; and as in the former lice are generated, so in the latter
the worms called erucæ, grasshoppers, and various insects and marine
monsters are produced. As the animated body likewise produces tears,
mucus, and the recrement of the ears, and sometimes gum from the
pustules of the face, thus also the earth produces amber and bitumen.
As the bladder too produces urine, thus likewise mountains pour forth
rivers. And as the body produces excrement of a sulphureous odour, and
crepitus which may also be inflamed, so the earth produces sulphur,
subterranean fires, thunder, and lightning. And as in the veins of an
animal blood is generated, and together with it sweat which is ejected
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account