The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 2 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning pProclus
Philosophy
The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 2 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning p
Proclus
Neoplatonism -- Early works to 1800; Plato -- Early works to 1800; Theology -- Early works to 1800
some indeed arranging and adorning the universe with the first, middle,
and last forms of production; others educing the rivers of life, and
pouring them on all things; others elevating the natures that have
proceeded, and recalling them to the father; and others presiding over
purity, and being the guardians of secondary natures.
CHAPTER VI.
Again, therefore, receiving the beginning of the theory of Plato from
the paternal cause, we assert as follows: The demiurgus and father of
this universe, being allotted this order in the intellectual kings, as
was before demonstrated, as he produced wholes totally, and referred
all things to the one form of the world, and the one perfection of the
universe, thus also he arranged and adorned the parts of the world, and
gave completion to the whole, contriving that all immortal and mortal
natures should be generated for the sake of the universe. And this is
what Plato introduces him saying in the Timæus to the junior Gods:
“That mortal natures therefore may exist, and that this universe may be
truly all, convert yourselves according to nature to the fabrication of
animals.” Since, however, after the monad, it is every where necessary
that a multitude should be generated proximate to the monad, and that
prior to an all-perfect division, united number should subsist (for
that which has proceeded to all things is not allied to that which
abides, nor is it possible that what is all-variously divided, should
be connascent with that which is impartible)--this being the case, the
demiurgus of wholes, produces indeed from himself, and his father a
number proximate to the monad of the fathers. But the three [fathers]
deriving their subsistence from one father, and first receiving the
power and dominion of fabrication, produce other second and third
fabricators from themselves, till through a diminution proceeding
according to [appropriate] measures, they evolve the whole demiurgic
number, the cause of which indeed, the demiurgic monad comprehends in
itself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account