The Sixth Sense: Its Cultivation and UseBrent, Charles Henry
Religion
The Sixth Sense: Its Cultivation and Use
Brent, Charles Henry
New Thought
The same primrose to a Linnæus or an Asa Gray would reveal an unseen
world. Conversely, there are some things which cannot affect our physical
being except by the way of mystical experience. Striking instances of
this sort have been suitably termed by von Hügel “psycho-physical.” They
are possible only where there is extraordinary sympathy between the
mystical and physical, the latter having been made very completely the
servant of the former. Only the mystic, or the specialist in the use of
the Mystic Sense, is eligible for such experiences. The tremendously
real fellowship with the Risen Lord of the disciples was of an ecstatic
or psycho-physical order. It degrades the Resurrection manifestations
to overemphasize their physical reality as though this, rather than the
mystical, were the important feature. Their dominant note is spiritual.
The physical perception came through the mystical. The experience of the
disciples could not be reproduced in after times with other men, for the
necessary conditions were wanting. Here and there among spiritual giants
there is a well authenticated psycho-physical experience, but it is of
phenomenal rather than of spiritual or moral value. And yet it is within
our power to see the Christ as really and effectively as the Apostles
did, though not wholly after the same manner.
St. Paul did not begin his life of faith when he had his psycho-physical
experience on the road to Damascus. He reached there a turning point
in its history. He was converted, turning his mystic powers in a new
direction. Those who were with him were not sufficiently developed to
see all that he saw or hear all that he heard.[28] His vision of Jesus
was momentary but his life of faith was continuous. If faith was at its
beginning when Abraham made his venture, it reached an illustrative
and inviting climax when St. Paul made his. It was greater for St. Paul
to espouse the cause of the Christ than to have a vision of Jesus. The
phenomenal or extraordinary does not always culminate in such courage and
devotion as his. It was because he was a mystic that he had his vision,
not because he had a vision that he became a mystic. The Apostles who
knew Jesus in the flesh had a lesser opportunity for faith than St. Paul
who saw Him but once and then after psycho-physical fashion, and who
never apprehended Him with all his bodily senses like those who saw “with
their eyes” and “beheld,” and whose “hands handled” the Word of Life. It
was fitting that St. Paul should give Christianity the impetus which made
it a world religion. The highest development of faith has assigned to it
the biggest undertaking. St. Peter with undeveloped intellectual gifts
and faith based on sight could not do what St. Paul with highly developed
reason and singular faith could do. The Risen Jesus Himself declared that
faith dependent upon physical or psycho-physical experience is of a lower
order than that in which the mystic sense is independent of phenomenal
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account