The Sixth Sense: Its Cultivation and UseBrent, Charles Henry
Religion
The Sixth Sense: Its Cultivation and Use
Brent, Charles Henry
New Thought
Reality is a term too often confined to that which can be expressed
in terms of bodily senses; whereas it is that which has existence in
heaven above, in the earth beneath, and in the waters under the earth,
and which, apart from human perception, though in a minimum degree or
passively, plays upon and affects man and his universe, but which reaches
its highest potentiality manward when, by the volitional operation of
human faculties it is subjectively apprehended and finds permanent
place in his consciousness. Reality is that which supports and feeds
the subconscious life by the pressure of its mere existence or laws of
being, but which is capable of bestowing larger gifts in proportion to
the degree in which it receives conscious admission into the activities
of personal experience. It is a law of spiritual or psychic, as well as
of physical, existence that every part is related to every other part
and influenced by it through either attraction or energy. In the case
of inanimate matter mere spacial propinquity or distance determines the
measure of attraction or energy of object upon object, but where sentient
beings are concerned the reaction of conscious volition on environment
is the determining factor regulating the degree of influence released.
The search for the real in internal processes cannot ignore the external.
Conversely the activities of the workaday world cannot summarily dismiss
the internal.[7] The physical senses have a modest but indispensable
part to play under the primacy of the Mystic Sense. The normal use of
the Mystic Sense does not make a mystic. The healthily developed man is
mystical though not a mystic. His dominating sense is that of the spirit,
not that of the flesh. A mystic, technically defined, is a specialist
in the subjective or internal, just as a collector is a specialist in
the objective or external. There is no danger in either extreme except
so far as its votary adopts an exclusive attitude toward its seeming
opposite (which really is its complement), or toward the balance of human
thought and life. A deliberate and persistent use of the Mystic Sense
without respect for the objective would be subversive of all progress
and a reversion to chaos. “The progress of thought consists in gradually
separating the series of objective and universally valid, from that of
subjective experiences. In the measure that their confusion prevails, man
is, to all intents and purposes, mad; and it is this note of insanity
that characterizes medicine and religion in their early stages. Dreams
and reality are mixed up; subjective connections are objectified.”[8]
If the objective and the subjective may not be divorced and set at odds
against one another, neither may they be confused. Both errors would
result in disorder and hopeless perplexity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account