The slave trade : $b Slavery and colorJervey, Theodore D. (Theodore Dehon)
History
The slave trade : $b Slavery and color
Jervey, Theodore D. (Theodore Dehon)
African Americans; Slave trade -- United States; Slavery -- United States; United States -- Race relations
The author of the Act, a cotton planter from Marlboro, W. D. Evans,
then arose and also apologized for it, and a verbal pledge was given,
that the Act should be repealed. At that time the Act was in its
amended form, only operative for one-half of the year. But so far from
being repealed, the only action concerning it, was the making of it
operative for the whole year as originally drawn, license reduced.
As dissatisfying as such a statement may be to those to whom the
injustice of it, and the disregard of a promise given under such solemn
conditions, is repugnant, it must be borne in mind, that similar
legislation of the State of Georgia had been, in the mean time,
reviewed by the Supreme Court of the United States, and sustained upon
the grounds _inter alia_, that—
“If it can be said to affect the freedom of egress from the State
or the freedom of the contract, it does only incidentally and
remotely.”[245]
The Supreme Court of the United States, therefore, shares with the
Lower South the responsibility for this harsh and unwise restriction
of the right of labor to its fullest wage, as well as the denial to a
peculiarly ignorant and helpless mass of the population, of an assisted
egress from localities where they are said to be such a menace from
their extraordinary numbers, that a setting aside of all law and
depriving of individuals of life without law by mobs is sometimes by
some people justified.
But, while arguing for labor its right to go where it wishes to win its
highest wage, we need not shut our eyes to the rank selfishness of the
industrial agencies, which sweep out of a community the bulk of the
able-bodied males and leave only the dependent women and children as
a burden on it. That, however, could and should be met by legislation
preventative of the breaking up of families simply to meet the demands
of industrial slavery. But the right of the laborer to all that his
work can earn should be protected, nevertheless.
As fruitful as the incidents of this extraordinary Convention were,
in illustration of phases of the Negro question, the most remarkable
of all, however, remains yet to be narrated. It has been previously
stated, that in 1865, when the States of the then defunct Confederacy
endeavored to rehabilitate themselves, as members of the Union, after
Emancipation, but before Reconstruction, both South Carolina and
Mississippi adopted codes, in which were the provisions that “every
person who may have of Caucasian blood seven-eighths or more shall be
deemed a white person,” thus separating such from “persons of color”,
a denomination including all Negroes and mixed blood having less than
seven-eighths of Caucasian blood, who were declared at the same time,
“not entitled to social or political equality with white persons.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account