The slave trade : $b Slavery and colorJervey, Theodore D. (Theodore Dehon)
History
The slave trade : $b Slavery and color
Jervey, Theodore D. (Theodore Dehon)
African Americans; Slave trade -- United States; Slavery -- United States; United States -- Race relations
Mr. G. M. Pinckney, the most sympathetic of all Calhoun’s biographers,
thus sums up the situation in 1850:
“If Mr. Calhoun had lived a little longer, it seems highly probable
that history would have been different. He certainly would have forced
matters to head at this session, and at this time, had the South taken
definite action it seems probable that there was left genuine love
enough for the Union on all sides to save it. To delay ten years was
necessarily fatal. Every moment lost but added fuel to the kindling
flame of sectional hatred. Mr. Calhoun’s death was a stunning blow.
The South fell into confusion. Delay resulted and natural causes
taking their course produced natural results.”[147]
Professor Paxson’s view of the situation for the same time seems
somewhat in accord with the above:
“Had the secession movement of 1850 grown into war, none of these
factors (i. e. railroads) would have been effective, and success for
separation could hardly have been questioned. But in 1860 secession
came too late. The Northwest was crossed and recrossed by an intricate
entanglement of tracks.”[148]
Such a coincidence of view in such widely separated quarters is
entitled to the highest respect; but it is not the view entertained
by the writer of this work, to whom 1850 seems to have been too late
to affect the situation favorably for secession, even if Calhoun had
survived; for, judged by his career, it is exceedingly doubtful if he
would have forced matters to a head. It would not have been in accord
with his past. He was a great parliamentarian and an even greater
debater; but all through his career his hand had been forced. He was
never quite ready for the situation as it developed. It may have been
greatly to his credit and consistent with his views; but he always
consulted and pondered. His political methods so disclose him. McDuffie
forced his hand with regard to Nullification. Clay forced his hand with
regard to the tariff of 1833. For Rhett’s resolution of 1838, he was
not ready, although that was the logical time and the logical course.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account