The slave trade : $b Slavery and colorJervey, Theodore D. (Theodore Dehon)
History
The slave trade : $b Slavery and color
Jervey, Theodore D. (Theodore Dehon)
African Americans; Slave trade -- United States; Slavery -- United States; United States -- Race relations
In it can be found not infrequent contributions from that Georgian
said by Professor Trent to have been the one poet the War produced
from the South; also some papers from that novelist of South Carolina
whom Lewisohn has mentioned in his article on South Carolina, in _The
Nation_ in 1922; and one from that Northern adopted son of South
Carolina, to whom the State owes the great institution, Clemson
College, for the aims of which General Hill strove so hard in his
opening article on “Education.” Space will not admit of more than three
extracts; the discussion by General Hill of education; an allusion to
E. G. Lee’s “Maximilian and His Empire,” and a still briefer allusion
to and endorsement of Wade Hampton and his policy concerning the
freedmen. The first is the most important. After discussing the number
of presidents from the South, including Lincoln and Johnson, eleven out
of the seventeen, up to that time elected, coming from the South and an
even greater proportion of secretaries of state and attorney generals,
General Hill indicates, that when business ability was desired, as in
the offices of secretary of the treasury and postmaster general, the
situation was at once reversed, and thus proceeds:
“The facts and figures above have been given in warning, not in
boastfulness. The pride which we might have felt in the glories of
the past is rebuked by the thought that they were purchased at
the expense of the material prosperity of the country; for men of
wealth and talents did not combine their fortunes, their energies
and their intellects to develop the immense resources of the land of
their nativity. What factories did they erect? What mines did they
dig? What foundries did they establish? What machine shops did they
build? What ships did they put afloat? Their minds and their hearts
were engrossed in the struggle for national position and national
honors. The yearning desire was for political supremacy and never for
domestic thrift and economy. Hence we became dependent upon the North
for everything from a lucifer match to a columbiad, from a pin to a
railroad engine. A state of war found us without the machinery to make
a single percussion cap for a soldier’s rifle, or a single button for
his jacket. The system of labor which erected a class covetous of
political distinction has been forever abolished; but the system of
education based upon it is still unchanged and unmodified.... The old
method of instruction was never wise; it is now worse than folly—’tis
absolute madness. Is not attention to our fields and firesides of
infinitely more importance to us than attention to national affairs?
Is not a practical acquaintance with the ax, the plane, the saw, the
anvil, the loom, the plow and the mattock vastly more useful to an
impoverished people, than familiarity with the laws of nations and
the science of government?... All unconscious of it though most of us
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account