The social contract & discoursesRousseau, Jean-Jacques
Philosophy
The social contract & discourses
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques
Economics; Political science -- Early works to 1800; Social contract
This will be a sufficient apology for my not dwelling on the manner in
which the lapse of time compensates for the little probability in the
events; on the surprising power of trivial causes, when their action is
constant; on the impossibility, on the one hand, of destroying certain
hypotheses, though on the other we cannot give them the certainty of
known matters of fact; on its being within the province of history,
when two facts are given as real, and have to be connected by a series
of intermediate facts, which are unknown or supposed to be so, to
supply such facts as may connect them; and on its being in the province
of philosophy when history is silent, to determine similar facts to
serve the same end; and lastly, on the influence of similarity, which,
in the case of events, reduces the facts to a much smaller number of
different classes than is commonly imagined. It is enough for me to
offer these hints to the consideration of my judges, and to have so
arranged that the general reader has no need to consider them at all.
[1] See Appendix.
[2] Justin. Hist, ii, 2. So much more does the ignorance of vice profit
the one sort than the knowledge of virtue the other.
[3] Egoism must not be confused with self-respect: for they differ both
in themselves and in their effects. Self-respect is a natural feeling
which leads every animal to look to its own preservation, and which,
guided in man by reason and modified by compassion, creates humanity
and virtue. Egoism is a purely relative and factitious feeling, which
arises in the state of society, leads each individual to make more of
himself than of any other, causes all the mutual damage men inflict one
on another, and is the real source of the "sense of honour." This being
understood, I maintain that, in our primitive condition, in the true
state of nature, egoism did not exist; for as each man regarded himself
as the only observer of his actions, the only being in the universe who
took any interest in him, and the sole judge of his deserts, no feeling
arising from comparisons he could not be led to make could take root
in his soul; and for the same reason, he could know neither hatred nor
the desire for revenge, since these passions can spring only from a
sense of injury: and as it is the contempt or the intention to hurt,
and not the harm done, which constitutes the injury, men who neither
valued nor compared themselves could do one another much violence, when
it suited them, without feeling any sense of injury. In a word, each
man, regarding his fellows almost as he regarded animals of different
species, might seize the prey of a weaker or yield up his own to a
stronger, and yet consider these acts of violence as mere natural
occurrences, without the slightest emotion of insolence or despite, or
any other feeling than the joy or grief of success or failure.
[4] Nature avows she gave the human race the softest hearts, who gave <
them tears.
THE SECOND PART
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account