The social contract & discoursesRousseau, Jean-Jacques
Philosophy
The social contract & discourses
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques
Economics; Political science -- Early works to 1800; Social contract
It now became the interest of men to appear what they really were
not. To be and to seem became two totally different things; and from
this distinction sprang insolent pomp and cheating trickery, with all
the numerous vices that go in their train. On the other hand, free
and independent as men were before, they were now, in consequence of
a multiplicity of new wants, brought into subjection, as it were,
to all nature, and particularly to one another; and each became in
some degree a slave even in becoming the master of other men: if
rich, they stood in need of the services of others; if poor, of their
assistance; and even a middle condition did not enable them to do
without one another. Man must now, therefore, have been perpetually
employed in getting others to interest themselves in his lot, and in
making them, apparently at least, if not really, find their advantage
in promoting his own. Thus he must have been sly and artful in his
behaviour to some, and imperious and cruel to others; being under a
kind of necessity to ill-use all the persons of whom he stood in need,
when he could not frighten them into compliance, and did not judge it
his interest to be useful to them. Insatiable ambition, the thirst of
raising their respective fortunes, not so much from real want as from
the desire to surpass others, inspired all men with a vile propensity
to injure one another, and with a secret jealousy, which is the more
dangerous, as it puts on the mask of benevolence, to carry its point
with greater security. In a word, there arose rivalry and competition
on the one hand, and conflicting interests on the other, together with
a secret desire on both of profiting at the expense of others. All
these evils were the first effects of property, and the inseparable
attendants of growing inequality.
Before the invention of signs to represent riches, wealth could hardly
consist in anything but lands and cattle, the only real possessions
men can have. But, when inheritances so increased in number and extent
as to occupy the whole of the land, and to border on one another, one
man could aggrandise himself only at the expense of another; at the
same time the supernumeraries, who had been too weak or too indolent to
make such acquisitions, and had grown poor without sustaining any loss,
because, while they saw everything change around them, they remained
still the same, were obliged to receive their subsistence, or steal
it, from the rich; and this soon bred, according to their different
characters, dominion and slavery, or violence and rapine. The wealthy,
on their part, had no sooner begun to taste the pleasure of command,
than they disdained all others, and, using their old slaves to acquire
new, thought of nothing but subduing and enslaving their neighbours;
like ravenous wolves, which, having once tasted human flesh, despise
every other food and thenceforth seek only men to devour.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account