The Solution of the Pyramid Problem; or, Pyramid Discoveries: With a New Theory as to their Ancient Use — John Shaqi
The Solution of the Pyramid Problem; or, Pyramid Discoveries: With a New Theory as to their Ancient UseBallard, Robert
History
The Solution of the Pyramid Problem; or, Pyramid Discoveries: With a New Theory as to their Ancient Use
Ballard, Robert
Pyramids
If the Gïzeh group of pyramids is placed and shaped in the manner I have
described, it must be clear that an exact model and plan, say a
thousandth of the size, could be very easily made--the plan being at the
level of the base of Cephren where the bases of the two main pyramids
are even;--and if they are not exactly so placed and shaped, it may be
admitted that their position and dimensions were known to the surveyors
or priests, so that such models could be constructed. It is probable,
therefore, that the instrument used in conjunction with these pyramids,
was a machine constructed in a similar manner to the simple machine I
have described, only instead of there being but one model pyramid on the
disc or upper limb, it bore the whole group; and the smaller pyramids
were what we may call vernier points in this great circle, enabling the
surveyor to mark off known angles with great accuracy by noticing how,
as he worked round the group of pyramids, one or other of the smaller
ones was covered by its neighbours.[9]
Footnote 9: See general plan of Gïzeh Group op. page 1.
The immensity of the main pyramids would require the smaller ones to be
used for surveys in the immediate neighbourhood, as the surveyor might
easily be too close to get accurate observations from the main pyramids.
The upper limb, then, was a disc or circular plate bearing the model of
the group.
Cheops would be situated in the centre of the circle, and observations
would be taken by bringing the whole model group into even line and even
light and shade with the Gïzeh group.
I believe that with a reasonable-sized model occupying a circle of six
or seven feet diameter, such as a couple of men could carry, very
accurate bearings could have been taken, and probably were taken.
The pyramid shape is the very shape of all others to employ for such
purposes. A cone would be useless, because the lights and shades would
be softened off and its angles from all points would be the same. Other
solids with perpendicular angles would be useless, because although they
would vary in width from different points of view they would not present
that ever changing angle that a pyramid does when viewed from different
directions.
After familiarity with the models which I have made use of in
prosecuting these investigations, I find that I can judge with great
accuracy _from their appearance only_ the bearing of the group from any
point at which I stand. I make bold to say that the pocket compass of
the Egyptian surveyor was a little model of the group of pyramids in his
district, and he had only to hold it up on his hand and turn it round in
the sun till its shades and angles corresponded with the appearance of
the group, to tell as well as we could tell by our compasses, perhaps
better, his bearing from the landmarks that governed his surveys.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account