The Solution of the Pyramid Problem; or, Pyramid Discoveries: With a New Theory as to their Ancient UseBallard, Robert
History
The Solution of the Pyramid Problem; or, Pyramid Discoveries: With a New Theory as to their Ancient Use
Ballard, Robert
Pyramids
+--------------------------++-------------------------------------+
| AB 28} × { 84} × { 672 || DG 3} × { 72} × {576 |
| BJ 45} 3 {135} 8 {1080 || GE 4} 24 { 96} 8 {768 |
| JA 53} {159} {1272 || ED 5} {120} {960 |
+--------------------------++-------------------------------------+
| DC 3} × {135} × {1080 || FW 48} × { 48} × {384 |
| CA 4} 45 {180} 8 {1440 || WV 55} 1 { 55} 8 {440 |
| AD 5} {225} {1800 || VF 73} { 73} {584 |
+--------------------------++-------------------------------------+
| EB 3} × { 63} × {504 || FB 20} × { 80} × {640 |
| BA 4} 21 { 84} 8 {672 || BA 21} 4 { 84} 8 {672 |
| AE 5} {105} {840 || AF 29} {116} {928 |
+--------------------------++=====================================+
| FH 3} × { 96} × { 768 || |
| HN 4} 32 {128} 8 {1024 || Note.--In the above table the first |
| XF 5} {160} {1280 || column _is the Ratio_, the second |
+--------------------------++ _the connected Natural Numbers_, and|
| AY 3} × { 36} × { 288 || the third column represents _the_ |
| YZ 4} 12 { 48} 8 { 384 || _length each line in R.B. cubits_. |
| ZA 5} { 60} { 480 || |
+--------------------------++-------------------------------------+
Fig. 60.
Reference to _Fig. 60_ and the preceding table, will show that the main
triangular dimensions of this plan (imperfect as it is from the lack of
eleven pyramids) are represented by four main triangles, viz:--
Ratio.
C A D C .. .. 3, 4, 5
F B A F .. .. 20, 21, 29
A B J A .. .. 28, 45, 53
F W V F .. .. 48, 55, 73
Figures 30 to 36 illustrate the two former, and _Figures_ 61 and 62
illustrate the two latter. I will call triangles of this class "primary
triangles," as the most suitable term, although it is applied to the
main triangles of geodetic surveys.
We have only to select a number of such triangles and a system of
trigonometry ensues, in which base, perpendicular, and hypotenuse of
every triangle is a whole measure without fractions, and in which the
nomenclature for every angle is clear and simple.
An angle of 43° 36′ 10·15″ will be called a 20, 21 angle, and an
angle of 36° 52′ 11·65″ will be called a 3, 4 angle, and so
on.
In the existing system whole angles, such as 40, 45, or 50 degrees, are
surrounded by lines, most of which can only be described in numbers by
interminable fractions.
In the ancient system, lines are only dealt with, and every angle in the
table is surrounded by lines measuring whole units, and described by the
use of a couple of simple numbers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account