The Solution of the Pyramid Problem; or, Pyramid Discoveries: With a New Theory as to their Ancient UseBallard, Robert
History
The Solution of the Pyramid Problem; or, Pyramid Discoveries: With a New Theory as to their Ancient Use
Ballard, Robert
Pyramids
I claim, therefore, that the theory I have set up, that the pyramids
were the theodolites of the Egyptians, is sound. That the ground plan of
these pyramids discloses a beautiful system of primary triangles and
satellites I think I have shown beyond the shadow of a doubt; and that
this system of geometric triangulation or right-angled trigonometry was
the method practised, seems in the preceding pages to be fairly
established. I claim, therefore, that I have discovered and described
the main secret of the pyramids, that I have found for them at last a
practical use, and that it is no longer "_a marvel how after the annual
inundation, each property could have been accurately described by the
aid of geometry._" I have advanced nothing in the shape of a theory that
will not stand a practical test; but to do it, the pyramids should be
_re-cased_. Iron sheeting, on iron or wooden framework, would answer. I
may be wrong in some of my conclusions, but in the main I am satisfied
that I am right. It must be admitted that I have worked under
difficulties; a glimpse at the pyramids three and twenty years ago, and
the meagre library of a nomad in the Australian wilderness having been
all my advantages, and time at my disposal only that snatched from the
rare intervals of leisure afforded by a arduous professional life.
After fruitless waiting for a chance of visiting Egypt and Europe, to
sift the matter to the bottom, I have at last resolved to give my ideas
to the world as they stand; crude necessarily, so I must be excused if
in some details I may be found erroneous; there is truth I know in the
general conclusions. I am presumptuous enough to believe that the R.B.
cubit of 1·685 British feet was the measure of the pyramids of Gïzeh,
although there may have been an astronomical 25 inch cubit also. It
appears to me that no cubit measure to be depended on is either to be
got from a stray measuring stick found in the joints of a ruined
building, or from any line or dimensions of one of the pyramids. I
submit that a most reasonable way to get a cubit measure out of the
Pyramids of Gïzeh, was to do as I did:--take them as a whole, comprehend
and establish the general ground plan, find it geometric and harmonic,
obtain the ratios of all the lines, establish a complete set of natural
and even numbers to represent the measures of the lines, and finally
bring these numbers to cubits by a common multiplier (which in this case
was the number eight). After the whole proportions had been thus
expressed in a cubit evolved _from_ the whole proportions, I established
its length in British feet by dividing the base of Cephren, as known, by
the number of my cubits representing its base. It is pretty sound
evidence of the theory being correct that this test, with 420 cubits
neat for Cephren, gave me also a neat measure for Cheops, from Piazzi
Smyth's base, of 452 cubits, and that at the same level, these two
pyramids become equal based.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account