The Song of Songs: Translated from the Original Hebrew, with a Commentary, Historical and Critical
Religion
The Song of Songs: Translated from the Original Hebrew, with a Commentary, Historical and Critical
Bible. Song of Solomon -- Commentaries
1. The Church at Ephesus ii. 1–7 i. 5–17 33–370
2. ,, ,, ,, Smyrna 8–11 ii. 1–17 371–707
3. ,, ,, ,, Pergamos 12–17 iii. 1–11 708–104
4. ,, ,, ,, Thyatira 18–29 iv. 1–v. 1 1046–138
5. ,, ,, ,, Sardis iii. 1–6 v. 2–vi. 2 1384–1721
6. ,, ,, ,, Philadelphia 7–13 vi. 9–vii. 14 1722–2059
7. ,, ,, ,, Laodicea 14–22 viii. 1–14 2060 and
onwards.
1693. The profound scholarship and exquisite taste of Bossuet, though a
Roman Catholic Bishop, would not allow him to follow these extravagant
theories. Presuming that the marriage of Solomon with the daughter of
Pharaoh is the primary object of this Song, and that the nuptial feast
among the Jews was hebdomadal, Bossuet divides the poem into seven
parts, corresponding to the seven days of the supposed duration of the
wedding. [91] The following is his division:—
Chapter.
1st day i.–ii. 6.
2nd day ii. 7–17.
3rd day iii.–v. 1.
4th day v. 2–vi. 9.
5th day vi. 10–vii. 11.
6th day vii. 12–viii. 3.
7th day viii. 4–14.
1700. Bishop Patrick, however, would not admit any literal meaning, but
found, almost in every word, some delightful mystery. Even the words,
“Thy navel is like a round goblet which wanteth not liquor; thy belly
is like a heap of wheat set about with lilies,” (chap. vii. 2,) at
which so much umbrage has been taken, this pious prelate says, may mean
“the two Sacraments which the Church administers to her children; the
Font in Baptism being represented by the former, and the Sacrament of
the Lord’s Supper by the other part of the figure.” [92]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account