The Song of the Rappahannock: Sketches of the Civil WarDodd, Ira Seymour
History
The Song of the Rappahannock: Sketches of the Civil War
Dodd, Ira Seymour
United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865 -- Personal narratives
Under our own colonel the discipline of the regiment had been excessive
in unimportant details and lax in essentials. All this was changed. We
felt ourselves ruled with an iron hand, yet with just discrimination,
so that while we stood in awe of our new commander we learned to like
him greatly; the more so when we found that he liked us, and in a
lurid, unrepeatable epigram expressed his opinion of what might have
been made of us if he could have had us from the first. Then, too, he
looked carefully after our comfort and our necessities. Some rascally
quartermaster had nearly starved us with bad rations. He quickly
stopped that. Moreover, to our great satisfaction, new rifles for the
regiment arrived. We gladly bade good-bye to our old "stuffed clubs,"
and we had occasional target practice with our new and effective
weapons. A fresh spirit came into us; we imagined ourselves fit for
anything.
Yet the regiment was really like a great boy who begins to think
himself a man. The weeding process was still incomplete and
progressing. Captains and lieutenants disappeared one by one. Some who
were otherwise competent had broken down in health; others had been
proved unfit. Their places were filled by promotions, mainly of
non-commissioned officers.
Our experience was precisely that of almost every volunteer regiment in
the army. After the first twelve months' service the line was usually
transformed. Serjeants and corporals, men who had been appointed
because of fitness rather than chosen because of popularity or
influence came into command as company officers. In much less than a
year not a single one of our original field officers remained, and only
three of the ten original captains of companies.
As to the men in general, the weeding process showed some results
worthy of record. It proved that very few men over forty years of age
were fit for war, either physically or morally, and that boys from
eighteen to twenty made excellent soldiers. It was not simply that the
young fellows were more reckless, but they never worried about coming
danger. They were more cheerful; they fretted less over privations;
they actually endured hardships better than older and stronger men. Our
losses among the boys were chiefly in battle; our losses among the old
men were mainly by sickness and physical exhaustion. Doubtless it might
be different with a body of men carefully selected and gradually inured
to a soldier's life; but in our volunteer regiments, hastily enlisted
and composed of men whose habit of life was suddenly changed, the facts
as observed in our experience would, I think, always hold good.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account