The Soul of Democracy: The Philosophy of the World War in Relation to Human Liberty — John Shaqi
The Soul of Democracy: The Philosophy of the World War in Relation to Human LibertyGriggs, Edward Howard
Philosophy
The Soul of Democracy: The Philosophy of the World War in Relation to Human Liberty
Griggs, Edward Howard
Democracy; World War, 1914-1918 -- Influence
Plato argued that society could never have patriotism in full measure
until the family was abolished. A singular notion that any school boy
to-day can readily answer, yet here is the curious situation. Family
life, among ourselves, in its better aspects, has reached a higher plane
than ever before in any people. More marriages are made on the only
decent basts of any marriage. This is the woman's land. Children have
their rights and privileges, even to their physical, mental and moral
detriment. It is here that men most willingly sacrifice for their
families, slaving through the hot summer in the cities, to send wife and
children to the seashore or the mountains; yet it is just here that men
most readily unhinge their consciences when they turn from private to
public life.
Some cynic has said that there is not an American citizen who would not
smuggle to please his wife. Of course the statement is not true, but if
you have ever crossed the ocean on a transatlantic liner, and watched
the devices to which ordinarily decent men--men who would be ashamed to
steal your pocket handkerchief or to lie to you as an individual--will
resort, in order to lie to the government or steal from the government,
you begin to wonder if the cynic was not right. The law, obviously, may
be unjust: if so, protest against it and seek to have it changed, but
while it is the law, does it not deserve your respectful obedience,
unless you would add to the dangerously growing disrespect for all law?
Next to the menace of selfishness is that of ignorance, and this, too,
takes confusingly new form. It is not ignorance of scientific fact and
law, dangerous as that is, that threatens, but ignorance of what our
institutions mean, of what they have cost, of the ideal for which we
stand among the nations. The celerity with which, even during the past
two decades, the younger generation has abandoned old standards and
ideals, is an ominous illustration. It is true:
"New occasions teach new duties, time makes ancient goods uncouth; 'They
must upward still, and onward, who would keep abreast of Truth."
Those words of Lowell's are as fully applicable to the present crisis,
as to that for which Lowell wrote them; but to give up the past, without
knowing that you are letting go, is surely not the part of wisdom.
A third menace shows in that fickleness of temper and false standard of
life that cause us to admire the wrong type of leader. Probably one
half of all the attacks on men of unusual wealth and success come from
other men, who would like to be in the same situation with those they
attack, and have failed of their ambition. Part of the attack is
sincere, no doubt, but if you assumed that all the abuse heaped upon
conspicuous men came from moral conviction, you would utterly misread
the situation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account