The Southern Case for School SegregationKilpatrick, James Jackson
History
The Southern Case for School Segregation
Kilpatrick, James Jackson
African Americans -- Segregation; Segregation -- Southern States
Your petitioners are hopeful that such an approach, much as it
may annoy the advocates of compulsory integration, will find a
favorable response among men who are willing to take the long view.
It seems to us wholly in accord with the oldest principles of
federalism--principles that have contributed much to the strength and
vitality of this Republic. It is the diversity of the States, their
ability to experiment, their right and power to respond to a variety
of local conditions and customs that together prevent the evils of
excessive centralism. “The traditions and habits of centuries were
not intended to be overthrown when the Fourteenth Amendment was
passed,” said Holmes. He remarked again: “There is nothing that I
more deprecate than the use of the Fourteenth Amendment beyond the
absolute compulsion of its words to prevent the making of social
experiments that an important part of the community desires, in the
insulated chambers afforded by the several States, even though the
experiments may seem futile or even noxious to me and to those whose
judgment I most respect.”
Not only is this approach in accord with a wise federalism; it
also offers the greatest opportunity to the Southern Negro himself.
In the course of a debate in the _Saturday Review_ with William
Sloane Coffin, the New York-born William F. Buckley, Jr., said
this: “If it is true that the separation of the races on account of
color is nonrational, then circumstance will in due course break
down segregation. When it becomes self-evident that biological,
intellectual, cultural, and psychic similarities among the races
render social separation atavistic, then the myths will begin to
fade, as they have done in respect of the Irish, the Italian, the
Jew; then integration will come--the right kind of integration.”
The South has begun to look upon its Negro people, since _Brown_,
in a new way. Shortcomings of the Negro that earlier had been
merely sensed are now acutely seen. But this is no bad thing.
Before any social ill may be remedied, it first must be diagnosed
and understood. Many a Southerner is now sensitive to the outward
and visible signs of segregation; he was not so before. Today the
detritus of a crumbling institution may be observed at every hand,
and there are times when he squirms a little inside. This retreat
to neutrality on the white man’s part is a necessary condition if
the Negro, _by his own exertions_, is to find an equal place in the
sun. In the end, the white man cannot do the job for him; Jim Crow
is dead, but the legal shot that felled him also put Massa in the
cold, cold ground. It is said that the high court “cast off the
Negro’s shackles”; it cast off his crutches too. The paternalism of
generations is vanishing year by year, to be replaced by a healthy
skepticism: The Negro says he’s the white man’s equal; _show me_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account