The Southern Case for School SegregationKilpatrick, James Jackson
History
The Southern Case for School Segregation
Kilpatrick, James Jackson
African Americans -- Segregation; Segregation -- Southern States
The deference that is paid to Holy Writ and to evidences of divine
intervention doubtless contributes to the character of the Southerner
as Romantic. Faith and superstition and myth are cousins, hardly even
once removed, and whatever else it may be, the South is first of all
a land of legends. This is a terrible annoyance to historians; they
look upon our pretty myths, and know they are not so, and expose
their fallacies in a thousand footnotes, but like the South, the
legends rise again. “Few groups in the New World have had their myths
subjected to such destructive analysis as those of the South have
undergone in recent years,” C. Vann Woodward once observed.
Yet the myths persist. There is the Old South legend of the
white-columned plantation, the hoop-skirted belles, the hot-blooded
men. In the foreground, beneath the magnolia trees, the darkies are
plucking banjos; in the background, rows upon rows of cotton, and off
to one side, a steamboat coming around the bend. Master loves the
Negroes, and the Negroes love old Master. The words and music are by
Stephen Foster. This, we like to say, was how things _were_ in the
ante-bellum South. The exasperated scholar, emerging from his Will
Books, cries out his anguish in the quarterly reviews: The records
_prove_ it was not so; they prove that slave ownership was limited;
the records prove that Southern Negroes--as many as 100,000 or
200,000 of them--deserted to the Union cause in the War; the records
probably prove there weren’t but thirty-two banjos in all of Carolina.
These labors of genealogy go utterly unrewarded. With what Cash has
described as the South’s “naive capacity for unreality,” our people
pat the historians on their fevered brows, thank them kindly just the
same, and return untroubled to an intuitive devotion to the things
that never were.
“I am an aristocrat,” cried Randolph of Roanoke. And the Southerner
regards him with an affection not extended to Clay or Calhoun or
Jefferson. So, we imagine, were they all--_all_ aristocrats, men of
ease, and grace, and elegance, and high birth; men who lived by a
code of honor, and died beneath the dueling oaks; men who gambled
with skill, and loved with passion; men who fought with a royal
disdain for risk. Well, Cash and Woodward and a dozen others have
had a hand in exploding this Cavalier myth. Tediously, with infinite
pains, they have dredged up the pedestrian facts. The Southerner will
have none of them; he knows better than to let a few facts interfere
with a good story. His colonists all wear ruffled collars; his
ladies, blue-veined, are pale and pure as talisman roses. “_I am an
aristocrat: I love freedom; I hate equality!_” Who in the South could
disclaim the Randolph inheritance?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account