The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 12, November, 1836Various
General
The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 12, November, 1836
Various
American literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals
The philosophy of Ionia was echoed back with increased vigor from
Magna Grecia. It is customary for the imagination, when Italy is its
theme, to fly back to the days of Rome—to revel with Horace and with
Cicero, with Virgil and Macænas. How great so ever may be our
veneration for those later ages, they should never blot out from
memory Italy’s earlier civilization, when Apuleia and Brutium were
seats of learning instead of Tuscany, and when Pythagoras was master
of its philosophy instead of Cicero and Seneca.
The _point de depart_ of philosophy was the origin of the world and
its elementary principle. Perhaps it was necessary that the mental
machinery should first be employed upon the grosser matter ere it
should seize hold of that most delicate of all materials, mind—that
{740} the artillerymen of logic should first acquire skill in
battering to pieces erroneous opinions on natural philosophy ere his
piece should be directed against errors in ethics and psychology. Its
_modus operandi_ was, generally, that of empiricism. This is in a
degree true of all from Thales to Plato.
As the astrologers and alchemists of all ages, so did the philosophers
of the time of Thales. Though arguing on correct bases, they obtained
the most improper results. Pushing their analysis beyond the bound of
reason—not content with the phenomena of matter, of which experience
has taught us more than suffices for the mind of man, they sought to
discover the _arcanum_, the hidden principle of the world’s existence.
They failed of course, and it is a humiliating though not less
instructive task to glance in succession at the varied, though not
less incoherent, labors of those great spirits who, notwithstanding
that absurdity which belonged more properly to their age than to them
individually, yet emitted occasional glimpses of what we in vain would
hope had led to better results.
According to Thales the principle of the world is water. He is said to
have been induced to adopt this, in consequence of some partial
experiments. There was besides another principle, prime mover of all
things, which he called _nous_. To him we are indebted for that best
and most ancient of maxims, _Know thyself_.
Friend and townsman of Thales was Anaxamander. He lit his lamp at the
same light and cast its blaze on the same subjects. His _point de
depart_ is infinity, which he surnamed all-containing and divine,
without determining it more precisely. Perpetual changes of earth and
of things can take place in infinity. These were his _principia_, but
from them he developed multitudes of doctrines which it is not now
important to examine. He bent his attention to astronomy, and nearly
similar were the doctrines of Pherecydes of Syros. He called his
trinity of principles, God, time, and matter. He attempted to explain
animated bodies and mankind. He considered the soul as imperishable.
Anaxamander and Pherecydes were the two first philosophers who wrote
their doctrines out.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account