The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 2, January, 1836 — John Shaqi
The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 2, January, 1836Various
General
The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 2, January, 1836
Various
American literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals
I once drew from him a sort of sketch of his life. It was little more
than a confirmation of what I had heard from others. This I have
already mentioned. But his manner, and the ideas which escaped from
him, gave me more insight into his character. His was the first
example I had ever seen of loyalty, not originating in personal
attachment, wholly uninfluenced by personal considerations, adopted as
a principle, but cherished into a passion. I doubt if he knew whether
the king he served was king of France or of Spain, and am very sure
that he knew no difference between Charles 3d, Charles 4th, and
Ferdinand. Whoever he was, he was "_Le Roi mon maitre_." As such he
always spoke of him to the last, owning no other allegiance,
acknowledging no other political obligation but the will and pleasure
of the "king his master." Was he therefore malcontent?--just the
reverse. "The king my master laid his commands upon me, to deliver up
the post which he had done me the honor to place under my authority,
to an officer appointed to receive it on behalf of the government of
the United States; and I obeyed {73} him. He gave me to understand at
the same time that it was his pleasure that I and my people should
submit to the authority of the United States, and conform to their
laws, and I have obeyed him. You see me quietly acquiescing in the new
order of things, and endeavoring in all things to regulate myself by
your laws; and I do so, because the king my master has commanded it."
There was nothing in his manner of saying this, betokening that
restiveness with which men submit to what they cannot help. He seemed
merely to find a satisfaction in rehearsing the principles by which he
had always professed to be governed, and contemplating the conformity
between these and his actions.
At the time of the cession of Louisiana to the United States, the old
man was in comfortable circumstances. The best house in the village
was his, and he had slaves and several arpens in the common field.[1]
But he had now fallen on evil days. He scorned to acquire any
knowledge of the language, laws, and customs of the new masters of the
country, and desired only to live in retirement and obscurity. But he
could not help having some dealings with the world, and the management
of these he committed to an only son, who had acquired a considerable
proficiency both in our language and laws.
[Footnote 1: An arpen is the French acre. In the sense in which the
word is here used, it means an allotment of land, in the common field
of a village, of an arpen in breadth, and usually forty arpens in
length. Three or four of these contiguous to each other, enclosed by
the common ring fence, and brought under the plough, were sufficient
to supply as much of the necessaries and comforts of life as the
simple peasantry of that country had any idea of.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account