The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 2, January, 1836Various
General
The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 2, January, 1836
Various
American literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals
gleam of his wild heart's yet wilder hopes. In London he entered upon
the field of politics, and soon became a caterer for a party
newspaper. Then followed the grinding meanness of booksellers and
editors; and maddened by the consciousness that his genius was poured
out only as water on the dust--that the exertions which he had trusted
would make him great among men, did not suffice to clothe him and
allay hunger,--maddened with the knowledge of these sad truths, are we
to marvel that poor Chatterton should "have done his own death?"
Chatterton was not unlike Byron. The morbid misanthropy hanging
unfixedly about the former--fully developed in the latter--was in both
but a retort upon their fellows. Both had hearts which only detraction
or cold neglect could harden into a hatred of humanity. Both threw out
venom against their enemies. But whence came this venom? The
affections of both were at one time as pure as the sap of the fabled
honey-tree. It was only by a fermentation produced by the hot
atmosphere of hostility or cruel slight, that the sap, once blander
than honey, became a bitter poison.
Chatterton was like Byron too in many other respects,--in his hunger
after immortality--in his alternations of excess and abstinence--in
his self-consciousness of genius--and in the most dark and deistic
views of death. Need I, after all that I have said of his ambition,
his struggles, and his most reckless tone of writing, say that
Chatterton's was a fiery and determined spirit? "His affections were
subordinate to the sterner leanings of the brain. He had the stout
soul and the tender heart of the old-time troubabour; but his heart
was less tender than his soul was stout."
Chatterton could never have been happy. The presence of ambition--that
brain-ache--would have made him miserable, had he lived beyond the
green season of youth even to its gratification. But why do I say that
he could have never been happy? There are surely more kinds of
happiness than the one quiet kind of which Darby and Joan are a fit
instance. Is there _not_ a thunder-storm kind? The mysterious joy
which we see thrown from the heart to the face in the picture of
"Byron on the sea-shore," is surely a species of happiness.
Chatterton, with hope to support him, might have been happy in the
darkest struggles of a dark career. With hope to support him! But
"that was the misery." Despair came to him and he died, (not out of
his boyhood) with no thought of future renown--with no thought but of
present obscurity and present wretchedness.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account