The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 2, January, 1836Various
General
The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 2, January, 1836
Various
American literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals
As this was an independent corps, serving at a distance from the
settlements, and only returning to them at long intervals, his station
was one of great responsibility. This he assumed boldly, and exercised
freely. Incapable of fear, he was not easily withheld from danger by a
distant authority, and, relying on the brave man's maxim, "that
success in war justifies a breach of orders," he made little scruple
of disregarding his, whenever an opportunity of striking a blow
presented itself. On some such occasion he incurred the displeasure of
his immediate superior, the commandant at St. Charles. To this worthy,
the success which exposed the impolicy of his own cautious prudence,
was by no means a justification for disobedience. He accordingly
recalled Tayon, imprisoned him, and sent him in chains to New Orleans.
Here the history of his imputed offence was so creditable to him, and
the bearing of the rude soldier so forcibly struck the intendant, that
his persecutor was deposed, and the prisoner returned in triumph,
bearing with him a commission as commandant of the post.
This was, in his estimation, the acmé of greatness to a subject. Of
the unapproachable majesty of the "King his master," as he delighted
to call him, he might have formed some such conception as we have of
angelic natures. But among mere men of common mould, he had seen
nothing, until his forced journey to New Orleans, and had perhaps
never imagined any thing above the dignity that encircled the
commandant at St. Charles.
There is nothing strange in this. An officer at once judicial and
executive, supreme in both capacities, always acting in person, and
enforcing his authority by the summary processes of despotism, is an
awful personage in his province. Though but a king of Liliput, he is a
king to Liliputians, and especially to himself. Such was Charlot Tayon
in his own estimation; he truly "bore him like a king," and when the
throne of his power was removed from under him, he lost nothing of
majesty in his fall. He was neither Dionysius at Corinth, nor
Bonaparte at St. Helena. He was neither familiar, nor peevish, nor
querulous, but sat himself down, in quiet poverty, in a cottage on the
edge of the village over which he had reigned.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account