The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 3, February, 1836Various
General
The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 3, February, 1836
Various
American literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals
Not satisfied with such vague promises, the British Minister replied
through the Ambassador at Paris, that although "no further suspicion
could be entertained of any design on the part of the French
Government to establish a military occupation of the Regency, or to
accomplish such a change in the state of territorial possession on the
shores of the Mediterranean, as should affect the interest of European
Powers," yet "he could not avoid calling the attention of Prince
Polignac to the peculiar situation of Algiers in its relation to the
Ottoman Porte;" that although "many Governments of Europe had
contracted engagements with that Regency as an independent State," and
others "continued to regard the Barbary States as essentially
dependant on the Turkish Empire," yet "the supremacy of the Sultan was
allowed by all;" he therefore "submitted to the serious consideration
of the Prince, what must be the effect of a precedent, which thus
disposes of the rights of a third party, against whom no complaint
whatever has been alleged." To this no reply was made, and the
negotiation or rather the discussion ended.
The preceding statement of the correspondence between the French and
British Governments, relative to the disposition to be made of Algiers
in the event of its conquest, is drawn from the official letters which
passed on the occasion; they were published in compliance with a call
made by Lord Aberdeen in the House of Peers of Great Britain on the 3d
of May 1833. From an examination of those documents, it appears that
no engagement was entered into by the French Government to recall its
troops from Algiers at any period; equally unfounded is the assertion
made by the French historical writers, respecting the reply of Prince
Polignac to the British Ambassador, that "France when insulted asked
the aid of no power in avenging its honor, and would be accountable to
none for the disposal of its conquests." It would be impossible to
give a summary of the results of the negotiation more satisfactory, or
drawn from a source entitled to greater consideration, than that
presented by Lord Aberdeen when he called for the production of the
Correspondence in the House of Lords; "no Convention was signed on the
subject, nor was any express stipulation entered into for the
evacuation of Algiers by the French force; but important engagements
were contracted, which in reference to all the Powers interested in
the commerce of the Mediterranean, and in the territorial arrangements
of that part of the world, were calculated to allay apprehensions
which might reasonably have existed respecting the occupation of
Algiers by the French."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account