The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 4, March, 1836Various
History
The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 4, March, 1836
Various
American literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals
4. Chalmers, Beverley, Holmes, Marshall and Robertson speak,
positively, of great discontents occasioned by restrictions and
oppressions upon Virginian commerce: and a Memorial in behalf of the
trade of the State presented to the Protector, mentions "_the poor
planters' general complaints that they are the merchant's slaves_,"
as a consequence of "_that Act of Navigation_."
5. It is probable that Bennett, Digges, and Matthews, (granting
Bennett to have been disloyal) were forced upon the colony by
Cromwell, whom Robertson (on the authority of Beverley and Chalmers,)
asserts to have named the governors during the Protectorate. The
election was possibly a mere form. The use of the equivocal word
_named_, is, as Judge Tucker remarks, a proof that the historian was
not speaking at random. He does not say _appointed_. They were
_named_--with no possibility of their nomination being rejected--as
the speaker of the House of Commons was frequently named in England.
But Bennett was a staunch loyalist--a fact too well known in Virginia
to need proof.
6. The reasoning here is reasoning in a circle. Virginia is first
declared republican. From this assumed fact, deductions are made
which prove Berkeley so--and Berkeley's republicanism, thus proved,
is made to establish that of Virginia. But Berkeley's answer (from
which Mr. Bancroft has extracted the words "I am but the servant of
the Assembly") runs thus.
"You desire me to do that concerning your titles and claims to land
in this northern part of America, which I am in no capacity to do;
for I am but the servant of the Assembly: _neither do they arrogate
to themselves any power farther than the miserable distractions in
England force them to_. For when God shall be pleased to take away
and dissipate the unnatural divisions of their native country, _they
will immediately return to their professed obedience_." Smith's New
York. It will be seen that Mr. Bancroft has been disingenuous in
quoting only a portion of this sentence. _The whole_ proves
incontestibly that neither Berkeley nor the Assembly _arrogated to
themselves any power beyond what they were forced to assume by
circumstances_--in a word, it proves their loyalty. But Berkeley was
loyal beyond dispute. _Norwood_, in his "Journal of a Voyage to
Virginia," states that "Berkeley showed great respect to all the
royal party who made that colony their refuge. His house and purse
were open to all so qualified." The same journalist was "sent over,
at Berkeley's expense, to find out the King in Holland, and have an
interview with him."
To these arguments in favor of Virginia's loyalty may be added the
following.
1. Contemporaries of Cromwell--men who were busy in the great actions
of the day--have left descendants in Virginia--descendants in whose
families the loyalty of Virginia is a cherished _tradition_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account