The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 4, March, 1836 — John Shaqi
The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 4, March, 1836Various
History
The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 4, March, 1836
Various
American literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals
conducted to the most brilliant discoveries. It was thus that Galileo
was conducted to some of his discoveries in hydrostatics by the hints
of Archimedes. Indeed, how many of the most important discoveries of
science have thus originated? Had Archimedes and Pappus never
written, or had they been neglected, the method of tangential lines
of Fermat and Barrow, approximating so closely as they do to the
discovery of the differential calculus, had perhaps never existed,
and to these we must attribute the subsequent important discovery of
Newton and Leibnitz. Indeed, the whole history of scientific
discovery is the history of a chain whose links have been forged by
different men, and fitted at different times. If such be the most
fortunate mode of scientific discovery, how much do we increase the
importance of the study of the ancient literature, when we come to
reflect that the termination of their scientific labors during the
night of the middle ages, is the point of departure from which all
modern scientific discovery has emanated. It will at once be
recollected that at the revival of letters, the only sources of
information were derived from the study of the ancients revived
chiefly by Boccacio and the philosophers of the Medici school and
from the Arabians, whose knowledge was drawn chiefly though at an
early period from the same source. Notwithstanding the elegant
rivalry between the Abassides and Ommoiades, which so much fostered
the spirit of learned inquiry, notwithstanding the resort of the
Arabian philosophers to the Indian school, and the polite and
elevated spirit of the Saracen conquerers who offered peace to the
modern and degenerate Greeks in exchange for their philosophy, it is
still evident that with the exception of some few discoveries in the
science of medicine, they were yet far behind the ancients at the
period of the decay of letters. Ancient science became the text upon
which modern writings were for ages the commentary, one of its
languages became the medium of communication between the learned and
polite of all nations, and no book of science was published for a
long time except in the Latin. The writings of mathematicians as far
down as Euler, those in medicine in England as far down as Hunter,
the writings of Blumenback, of Grotius and Spinoza, the Novum Organon
of Bacon, and indeed those of nearly all the modern philosophers,
until the middle of the seventeenth century, {227} were in Latin. In
Belles Lettres, criticism and rhetoric, in history, physics and
morals, the models of the moderns were all chosen from antiquity. In
addition to this too, the progress of Roman arms, and afterwards the
advance of Roman letters, had incorporated much of the Latin language
and idiom in all of the polite modern languages except the German.
The Italian and Spanish in particular have been well called "bastard
Latin." How then can any student of modern literature only, hope to
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account