The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 5, April, 1836Various
General
The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 5, April, 1836
Various
American literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals
"On the death of Matthews, the Virginians were without a chief
magistrate, just at the time when the resignation of Richard had
left England without a government. The burgesses, who were
immediately convened, resolving to become the arbiters of the fate
of the colony, enacted 'that the supreme power of the government of
this country shall be resident in the assembly, and all writs shall
issue in its name, until there shall arrive from England a
commission which the assembly itself shall adjudge to be lawful.'
This being done, Sir William Berkeley was elected governor, and
acknowledging the validity of the acts of the burgesses, whom it was
expressly agreed he could in no event dissolve, he accepted the
office to which he had been chosen, and recognized, without a
scruple, the authority to which he owed his elevation. 'I am,' said
he, 'but a servant of the assembly.' _Virginia did not lay claim to
absolute independence; but anxiously awaited the settlement of
affairs in England._"
It will here be seen, that the words italicized beginning "Virginia
did not lay claim," &c. are very nearly, if not altogether
equivalent to what we assume as proved by _the whole_ of Berkeley's
reply, viz. _that neither Berkeley nor the Assembly arrogated to
themselves any power beyond what they were forced to assume by
circumstances_. Our charge, therefore, of disingenuousness on the
part of Mr. Bancroft in quoting only a portion of the answer, is
evidently unsustained, and we can have no hesitation in recalling
it.
At page 226 of the History of the United States, we note the
following passage.
"At Christmas, 1648, there were trading in Virginia, ten ships from
London, two from Bristol, twelve Hollanders, and seven from New
England. The number of the colonists was already twenty thousand;
and they, who had sustained no griefs, were not tempted to engage in
the feuds by which the mother country was divided. They were
attached to the cause of Charles, not because they loved monarchy,
but because they cherished the liberties of which he had left them
in undisturbed possession; and after his execution, though there
were not wanting _some_ who favored republicanism, _the government
recognized his son without dispute. The loyalty of the Virginians
did not escape the attention of the royal exile._ From his retreat
in Breda he transmitted to Berkeley a new commission, and _Charles
the Second, a fugitive from England, was still the sovereign of
Virginia_."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account