The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 5, April, 1836Various
General
The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 5, April, 1836
Various
American literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals
This passage alone will render it evident that Mr. Bancroft's
readers have been wrong in supposing him to maintain the disloyalty
of the State. It cannot be denied, however, (and if we understand
Mr. B. he does not himself deny it,) that there is, about some
portions of his volume, an ambiguity, or perhaps a laxity of
expression, which it would be as well to avoid hereafter. The note
of Dr. Hawks we consider exceptionable, inasmuch as it is not
sufficiently explanatory. The passages in Mr. B.'s History which we
have noted above, and other passages equally decisive, were pointed
out to Dr. Hawks. He should have therefore not only stated that Mr.
B. disclaimed the intention of representing Virginia as republican,
but also that his work, if accurately examined, would not admit of
such interpretation. The question of Virginia's loyalty may now be
considered as fully determined.
CHIEF JUSTICE MARSHALL.
It is with great pleasure, at the opportunity thus afforded us of
correcting an error, that we give place to the following letter.
_Philadelphia, March 25, 1836_.
SIR,--A mistake, evidently unintentional, having appeared in the
February number of your journal for {318} this year, we feel
convinced you will, upon proper representation, take pleasure in
correcting it, as an impression so erroneous might have a
prejudicial tendency. Under the notice of the Eulogies on the Life
and Character of the late Chief Justice Marshall, it is there stated
that "for several years past Judge Marshall had suffered under a
most excruciating malady. A surgical operation by Dr. Physick of
Philadelphia at length procured him relief; but a hurt received in
travelling last Spring seems to have caused a return of the former
complaint with circumstances of aggravated pain and danger. Having
revisited Philadelphia in the hope of again finding a cure, his
disease there overpowered him, and he died on the 6th of July, 1835,
in the 80th year of his age."
Now, sir, the above quotation is incorrect in the following respect:
Judge Marshall never had a return of the complaint for which he was
operated upon by Dr. Physick. After the demise of Chief Justice
Marshall, it became our melancholy duty to make a _post mortem_
examination, which we did in the most careful manner, and
ascertained that his bladder did not contain one particle of
calculous matter; its mucous coat was in a perfectly natural state,
and exhibited not the slightest traces of irritation.
The cause of his death was a very diseased condition of the liver,
which was enormously enlarged, and contained several tuberculous
abscesses of great size; its pressure upon the stomach had the
effect of dislodging this organ from its natural situation, and
compressing it in such a manner, that for some time previous to his
death it would not retain the smallest quantity of nutriment. By
publishing this statement, you will oblige
Yours, very respectfully,
N. CHAPMAN, M.D.
J. RANDOLPH, M.D.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account