The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 6, May, 1836Various
General
The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 6, May, 1836
Various
American literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals
_Eventuate_. The editor of Coleridge's Table Talk, very justly
denounces this Americanism. He says it is to be met with in Washington
Irving's Tour to the Prairies. If so, so much the worse for the book.
It is a barbarism, "I pray you avoid it." We do not need the word, so
that it cannot be sneaked in, under the plea of necessity. The English
verb, _to result_, means all, I presume, that the fathers of
_eventuate_ design that it shall mean. If we may coin _eventuate_ from
event, why not _processiate_ from process, _contemptiate_ from
contempt, _excessiate_ from excess, and a hundred more, all as useful
and elegant as _eventuate_?
_Directly_. Many of the English writers of the present day, use this
word in a manner inelegant and unsanctioned, I am convinced, by any
standard author. They appear to think that it has the same meaning as
the phrase "as soon as." For instance: "The troops were dismissed
_directly_ the general had reviewed them." "The House of Lords
adjourned _directly_ this important bill had passed." I am happy to
find that the writers in this country have not fallen into it.
_Mutual_. When persons speak of an individual's being _a mutual
friend_ of two others, who perhaps may not know each other, they
attach a meaning to the word mutual which does not belong to it. A and
B may be mutual friends, but how C can be the mutual friend of A and B
it is difficult to comprehend. Where is the mutuality in this case? We
should say, C is the _common_ friend of A and B. Several of the
associations for interment which have lately been instituted, have
seized upon the word _mutual_ and used it very absurdly. They style
themselves "Mutual Burial Societies." How can two individuals _bury
each other_? and yet this is implied by the term "_mutual_."
Is not the familiar phrase, "now-a-days," a corruption of "in our
days?"
"_If I am not mistaken_." This is evidently wrong. If what I say to
another is misunderstood, I am _mistaken_, but if I misunderstand what
is said to me, I am _mistaking_, and so we should speak and write.
_Degrees of perfection_. "The army," says president Monroe, in one of
his messages, "has arrived at _a high degree of perfection_." There
can be no degrees of perfection. Any thing which is _perfect_ cannot
become _more_ {389} _perfect_, and any thing which falls short of
perfection is in _a degree of imperfection_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account