The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 8, July, 1836Various
General
The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 8, July, 1836
Various
American literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals
The design of the writer is excellent, and deserves to be
imitated. The “Critical Notices,” though in themselves good, are not
generally equal to the Editor's previous efforts. As it was however
permitted to Homer sometimes to nod, so should the really gifted mind
which presides over the Messenger, be allowed occasionally a little
repose. Of the poetry, the writer of this brief notice will say
nothing. Some of it is good—but he is but an indifferent judge.
From the New York Weekly Messenger.
_Southern Literary Messenger_.—The high encomiums which this
periodical has received from all parts of the Union, it most richly
deserves. We have been favored with the five first numbers of the
current (second) volume, and have had an intellectual feast in the
perusal of many articles contained therein. To express our opinion
candidly of the talents and erudition of the worthy editor of this
monthly, would expose us to the charge of plagiarism, because it would
be exactly similar to half a hundred others, who have preceded us in
expressions of approbation. What shall we do then? To go through and
examine every article in five numbers, is more than we have space for.
But we must—we feel bound to say, Virginians especially are indebted
to Mr. White for his _unprecedented_ literary zeal. He ought to meet
with encouragement; in short, we believe he does,—but there should be
an effort made to sustain the undertaking, by a continually increasing
list of _paying_ subscribers.
If our friends in the city or country wish their table filled with
rich literary food once a month, they should immediately order “The
Southern Literary Messenger,” published by T. W. White, Richmond, Va.
There is one article to which we object, the burlesque, or caricature,
not criticism, on Fay's “Norman Leslie,” but in making only one
objection, we think much is said for the periodical, more than can be
said of any other of the monthlies. We really do think it is as good
as any, if not the very best in these United States. We think so
highly of the Richmond “Messenger,” that if we had the numbers of the
first volume, we would have them neatly bound, and placed in our
library as a literary treasure.
From the Norfolk Herald.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account