The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 9, August, 1836Various
History
The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 9, August, 1836
Various
American literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals
When the term of probation at school is completed, the lads are
transferred to a larger scene of action—a college—where they are
destined to remain four or five years more, of which term probably a
third part is consumed in the study of the two languages in question;
thus making on a fair computation, four or five years employed in
learning languages of which little use is made in after life.
To facilitate the judgment on this system, I will venture to assume as
postulates,
1. That the advantages of the acquirement of a foreign language may be
considered under three points of view—the capacity of correctly
reading—of writing—or of speaking it.
2. That not one, in one thousand of our citizens, ever has occasion to
write or speak Latin.
3. That not above one in a hundred of those who learn Latin in this
country, is capable, were it necessary, of correctly writing or
conversing in that language.
4. That lads of moderate capacity and no very extraordinary
application, frequently acquire the French language in twelve or
eighteen months, so as to be able not merely to read it
understandingly, but to comprehend it when spoken, and to make
themselves tolerably well understood in conversation.
5. That sometimes in addition they acquire the Spanish within that
period.
6. That the Latin language is not more difficult than the
French—indeed I believe not so difficult. On this point I shall rely
on the opinion given, and the fact stated, by Locke, to be offered in
the sequel.
7. That the French being attainable in twelve or eighteen months, and
the Latin not being more difficult, it follows that it is an error to
consume three, four, five, or six years in the attainment of the
latter.
8. That in the common intercourse of life, which “comes home to the
business and bosoms of men,” the French is more useful than the Latin,
Greek, Hebrew, and Arabic.
9. That except to the members of the learned professions, and men of
leisure and curiosity, the learned languages, to the mass of mankind,
are of no use whatever beyond the ability to understand authors, and
quotations from them, in those languages.
10. That, therefore, for lads intended for trades or business, all the
time bestowed on learning Latin, beyond the capacity to read and
understand it, is literally thrown away.
Some of these assumptions may be questioned, and, perhaps, are
questionable, without materially affecting the proposed plan. Be this,
however, as it may, I shall fortify myself with such an array of
authorities, as, if it do not convince the reader of the soundness of
the doctrines here advocated, will shield me from the charge of
empiricism for advancing them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account