The Sovereignty of the Sea: An Historical Account of the Claims of England to the Dominion of the British Seas, and of the Evolution of the Territorial WatersFulton, Thomas Wemyss
History
The Sovereignty of the Sea: An Historical Account of the Claims of England to the Dominion of the British Seas, and of the Evolution of the Territorial Waters
Fulton, Thomas Wemyss
Fisheries -- Great Britain; Great Britain. Royal Navy -- History; Sea-power; Territorial waters -- Great Britain -- History
manner of people according to the laws, statutes, and prohibitions,
franchises and customs. And whereas in the first article of the
alliance formerly made between the said Kings, in the treaties upon the
last peace of Paris are comprised the words which follow in a schedule
annexed to these presents.
First, it is concluded and accorded between us and the messengers
and proctors aforesaid in the name of the said Kings that the said
Kings shall from this time forward be good, true, and loyal friends,
and be aiding to one another against all men saving the Church of
Rome in such manner that if any one or more, whosoever they be,
will disturb, hinder, or molest the said Kings in the franchises,
liberties, privileges, rights, dues, or customs of them and their
kingdoms, they shall be good and loyal friends and allies against
every man living, and ready to die to defend, keep, and maintain
the franchises, liberties, privileges, rights, dues and customs
aforesaid; Except (on the part of) the said King of England, Monsieur
John, Duke of Brabant, in Brabant, and his heirs descended from him
and the daughter of the King of England, and except (on behalf of)
our said lord the King of France, the excellent Prince, Monsieur
Albert, King of Almaigne [and] his heirs Kings of Almaigne, and
Monsieur John, Count of Hainault in Hainault. And that the one shall
not be of counsel nor aiding where the other may lose life, member,
temporal estate, or honour.[75]
Monsieur Reymer Grymbaltz, Master of the navy of the said King of
France, who calls himself admiral of the said sea, deputed by his
lord aforesaid for his war against the Flemings did after the said
alliance made and confirmed, and against the form and force of the
same alliance and the intent of them that made it, by commission of
the King of France wrongfully usurp the office of admiralty in the
said sea of England and did exercise it for a year and more taking
the people and merchants of the kingdom of England and elsewhere
passing through the said sea with their goods, and committed the
people so taken to the prison of his said lord the King of France,
and by his judgment and award caused their goods and merchandises
to be delivered to the receivers of the said King of France deputed
for this purpose in the ports of his said kingdom, as to him forfeit
and acquired. And the taking and detaining of the said people with
their said goods and merchandises, and his said judgment and award
concerning the forfeiture and acquest of them, he has justified before
you, Lords Auditors, in writing, according to the authority of the
said commission of the admiralty aforesaid by him thus usurped, and
during a prohibition commonly made by the King of England by his power,
according to the tenor of the third article (_sic_) of the alliance
aforesaid, which contains the words below [above] written, requiring
that he may thereupon be quit and absolved, to the great damage and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account