Lawyers -- Fiction; New York (N.Y.) -- Fiction; United States -- Social conditions -- 1865-1918 -- Fiction
"Yes, that’s one way of putting it, but it’s really wages. It’s the
wages that the employer draws for his executive ability: he must be paid
for his work if his employees are paid for theirs. It’s the fair return
that he gets for the risk he’s run in starting his business, and it’s
his reward for his years of saving up his money till he had enough to
start that business."
Luke agreed.
"Of course," said he, "we don’t want the man that’s done these things to
use his power so as to prevent other men from doing them, but we haven’t
any right to take from him what he’s earned or to stop him from going on
earning it."
In much Ruysdael’s manner, Luke’s father, during Luke’s visits to his
home in Americus, would talk of government. Government, by which he
meant the particular form of government adopted by the United States,
was one of the few topics that could move the Congressman from his
characteristic reticence. He scorned the tyranny of Russia and the
English make-shift of a constitutional monarchy. In the United States
the people could rule; the means were provided; if they failed now and
then, it was for a brief time only. To Mr. Huber the majority was as
infallible in matters of government as, in matters of faith, the Pope is
to a devout Catholic, and the hope of the majority lay in that party
which had freed the negro from slavery and saved the country from
disruption.
To these ideals Luke was true. He saw the rottenness of Tammany rule in
New York and knew it for a symptom of the disease that made a national
danger of the entire rank and file of the Democrats; he saw the
integrity of Leighton, and accepted it as a true token of Republican
virtue. He wanted the government restored to its pristine simplicity,
wealth curbed of its newly developed predatory instincts, religion
restored to its place in the daily thought and conduct of man.
§3. Leighton’s announced intention to "clean up" New York was proving,
nevertheless, a slow process. He had great difficulty in obtaining
evidence against the Democratic politicians whose scalps he had promised
to hang to the belt of the public. Grand Juries had a way of including
enough partisans of these politicians to prevent the finding of true
bills. When true bills were found, petty juries generally contained
enough Democrats to persuade the other jurors to acquit or to hold out
for a disagreement. Even when convictions were secured, the appeals had
to be argued before appellate courts composed of men that owed their
positions to friends of the appellants.
"It’s rotten luck," said Leighton, "but I believe they’ve got us
scotched. We’ve tried seven cases, four of them twice and two three
times; we’ve had our hands full with appeals, and the only one of the
lot that we’ve sent to jail is a peanut politician from Second Avenue
who doesn’t control ten votes."
"Yes," said O’Mara, "and they let _him_ go because they believed he was
getting ready to go back on them next election."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account