In the case of the Spiritists of our own times, much harm is done by
telling them the spirit-manifestations are all humbuggery, imagination,
fraud, or trickery. These people know that it is not so. They know that
they are not knaves, that they practise no trickery, and have no wish to
deceive or be deceived. They are not conscious of any dishonest
intentions, and they have no reason to think that they are less
intelligent or less sharp-sighted than they who abuse them as impostors,
or ridicule them as dupes. The worst way in the world to convert a man
from his errors is to begin by abusing him, and denying what he knows to
be true. Except in the teachings of God, or what is the same thing, the
teachings of men appointed, instructed, and supernaturally assisted by
him to teach, we never find unmixed truth, for to err is human; and on
the other hand, we never find pure, unmixed falsehood. Unmixed falsehood
is universal negation, and no negation is possible but by an
affirmation. Error is the misapplication of the true. These Spiritists
are deceived, are deluded, I grant, for they are the sport of a lying
and deceiving spirit; but they are not deceived or deluded as to the
phenomena to which they testify, nor, as a general thing, do they wish
to deceive others. Among them there may be knaves and fools, there may
be quacks and impostors, but I have no reason to suppose that the mass
of them are not as intelligent and as honest as the common run of men,
as the world goes. Their error is in their explication of the phenomena,
not in asserting the reality of the phenomena; and to begin by telling
them that no such phenomena have ever occurred, that the
spirit-manifestations are all humbug, is, to say the least, a very
unwise proceeding. If you are a minister of religion, by doing so you
are only playing into the hands of the devil, for you outrage the
natural sense of justice and truth which these people still retain, and
dispose them in turn to look upon religion itself, as held by the
Christian Church, as a humbug.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account