At that time I had paid not much attention to Mesmerism. I had heard of
Mesmer indeed, of his extraordinary pretensions, and the wonderful
phenomena which he professed to produce by his rod and tub; but I had
supposed that the matter had been put at rest for all sensible persons
by the famous report of the French Academy in 1784, signed, among
others, by Bailly the astronomer, and our own Franklin. I supposed that
every scientific man acquiesced in the conclusion of that report, that
the extraordinary phenomena exhibited by magnetism were to be ascribed
to the imagination, and that from the date of that report magnetism had
ceased to occupy the attention of the scientific. I was therefore
surprised, nay, scandalized, to find a man of real science, and, as I
wished to believe, of real worth, professing faith in what I had been
led to regard as an exploded humbug, and which, at the very best, could
have no practical utility beyond illustrating the deceptive power of the
imagination, and the sad consequences which might result to those
weak-minded people who become dupes to their own disordered fancy.
Dr. P—— assured me that I was mistaken both as to the bearing and as to
the effect of the famous report of the French Academy. That report, he
said, concedes the reality of the mesmeric phenomena, and only declares
that the assertion of Mesmer, that they are produced by means of a
subtle fluid analogous to electricity or magnetism, was not proven or
demonstrated by the experiments the commission witnessed; which gives no
uneasiness to any animal magnetist in our day, because now no one
pretends to explain those phenomena by means of such a fluid. It is
true, he said, the commission, in their published report, assert that
the phenomena are to be explained by the imagination; but in a private
report, addressed to the king, they say, that “it is impossible not to
recognize in them a _great power_ which agitates and subjects the
patients, and of which the magnetizer appears to be the depositary.”
This, contended Dr. P——, is by no means compatible with the theory which
ascribes them to the imagination, for that theory supposes the cause
that produces them to be in the magnetized, since it is to their
imagination, not to that of the magnetizer, that they are to be
ascribed; but in this secret report, the power which produces them is
assumed to be in the magnetizer, “of which,” it says, “he who magnetizes
seems to be the depositary.” For these, as well as other reasons, he
said, the report of the Academy was not regarded by magnetists as any
authority against Animal Magnetism as understood and practised at the
present time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account