The Bible is no less clear and explicit on the subject than the Church.
It teaches that Satan, in the form of a serpent, seduced Eve to eat of
the forbidden fruit; it relates the doings of the Egyptian magicians; it
forbids necromancy and evocation of the dead, and commands the Jews not
to suffer a witch to live; declares that all the gods of the Gentiles
are devils; tells us that the devil is the prince of this world, that he
goeth about like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour; bids us
resist the devil and he will flee from us. St. Paul speaks of the prince
and the powers of the air that besiege us, and against whom we must put
on the whole armor of God, and do valiant battle. Moreover it speaks of
demoniacs, or persons possessed with devils; and among the marvellous
works ascribed to Jesus Christ, is that of expelling demons, or casting
out devils. All Christians, then, must admit that there is a devil, and
that there are evil spirits, who may, and who do, interfere with men,
harass them, and sometimes take literal possession of them. A recent
French author, a sincere Christian believer, has felt this. “The
question,” he says, “at the Christian point of view, is by no means
indifferent, but is, as it were, the mother question, the question of
questions. It is no less than to determine whether the Bible and the
Church have or have not been really mistaken in one of their fundamental
principles. For a man filled with Christian desires, and cherishing at
the same time a respect for evidence, the question is most grave. It
touches the whole of faith, neither more nor less; and as it will not do
to admit in the sacred Scriptures, whose language is assumed to be
inspired, what is called _manners of speaking_, or _complaisances_ for
the age, or _remains of ignorance_, we must be permitted to say, that if
it were proved that the Bible in the time of Pharaoh mistook simple and
miserable jugglers for real _magicians_, poor charlatans for
_enchanters_, a few knavish and lying priests for the false gods of the
Gentiles, simple mummeries for real _evocations_, delirious cataleptics
for spirits of Python, &c.; if it were proved that Jesus Christ, in
granting to his disciples the gift, and prescribing to them the rules,
of expelling demons, mistook a fact of pure physiology; if it were
proved that the Church, in instituting exorcism, and prescribing for it
precise and learned formulas, and, moreover, practising it for eighteen
centuries, has been deceived during all that period,—we should feel that
it is all over with Christianity; we should regard it as condemned, and
hasten to renounce an authority so little judicious, and so little to be
depended upon.” Christians may, undoubtedly, dispute as to this or that
particular case, and say that the evidence of demonic intervention, in
this or that particular instance, is not conclusive; but they cannot,
without renouncing their faith, and becoming Sadducees, deny that such
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account