The starry skies : $b or, First lessons on the sun, moon and stars — John Shaqi
The starry skies : $b or, First lessons on the sun, moon and starsGiberne, Agnes
General
The starry skies : $b or, First lessons on the sun, moon and stars
Giberne, Agnes
Astronomy -- Juvenile literature
There is no reason why one should not do this, if only one could get
along fast enough.
It would have to be very rapid travelling. If you wished to keep that
star in sight, overhead, for twenty-four hours, you would have to
do--what do you think? You would have to rush _round the whole world_
in twenty-four hours!
If you could possibly manage to do that, you might possibly choose any
bright star overhead that you liked, and keep it in view all night; in
fact for two nights, with no day between; for you would journey _with
the night_.
Or if you chose to follow the Sun by day, keeping him overhead in your
rapid rush over continents, and mountains, and oceans, you might have
a double day of twenty-four hours, with sunshine all the while and no
darkness.
But think what such a rush would mean! Think how big the world is!
People sometimes do travel all round the whole earth, and the journey
takes them many months. Even if they stopped to look at nothing by
the way, and went as fast as possible, and cared nothing about being
tired--even then, at the very least, it would take them many weeks.
To get round the world, on the Equator, or from England, or from the
United States, or from Australia, in twenty-four hours, is a thing
which no living man could ever do! The Sun and the stars go much too
fast for us.
They are seen to whirl round the whole earth, swiftly and calmly and
easily, with no manner of fuss or difficulty, once in every twenty-four
hours!
Ah! but do they? That is the question. Do they really all whirl round
and round, at this rate?
When you take a journey in a train, and look out of the window, what do
you see?
Everything seems to be moving. The more distant hills travel slowly;
fields and villages speed at a good rate; houses and hedges near at
hand rush by; and the telegraph poles flash past as if running away.
But one house does not go one way and another house in the opposite
way. All of them journey in the same direction.
Do they really journey? Are the fields and hills, the villages and
trees and telegraph poles, all spinning swiftly along, while you in
your train sit quite still, not moving at all?
It must be one of the two things: either _they_ are on the move, and
you are quiet; or else they are quiet, and _you_ are yourself rushing
along, so that they only seem to move.
You would not have much difficulty in deciding. Even if you did not
feel the carriage in which you sit to be shaking and jarring with its
own rush, still you would count it easier to believe that the train was
going forward than to think that all the hills and fields and trees and
houses were speeding the opposite way.
It is almost the same thing with our earth. We see the Sun, and the
Moon, and all the stars, hurrying past, and we have to believe one of
two things: either _they_ are all moving, and we are still; or else
_we_ are moving and that makes them only seem to move.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account