The State: Its History and Development Viewed SociologicallyOppenheimer, Franz
History
The State: Its History and Development Viewed Sociologically
Oppenheimer, Franz
State, The
more efficient system of coöperating labor, the division of labor in
the workshops, in order to crown man as the ruler of natural forces, as
king of the planet. Slavery of antiquity and of modern capitalism was
once necessary; now it has become superfluous. According to the story,
every free citizen of Athens disposed of five human slaves; but we
have supplied to our fellow citizens of modern society a vast mass of
enslaved power, slaves of steel, that do not suffer in creating values.
Since then we have ripened toward a civilization as much higher than
the civilization of the time of Pericles, as the population, power and
riches of the modern communities exceeds those of the tiny state of
Athens.
Athens was doomed to dissolution--by reason of slavery as an economic
institution, by reason of the political means. Having once entered that
pathway, there was no outlet except death to the population. Our path
will lead to life.
The same conclusion is found by either the historical-philosophical
view, which took into account the tendency of the _development of the
state_, or the study of political economy, which regards the tendency
of _economic development_; viz., that the economic means wins along
the whole line, while the political means disappears from the life of
society, in that one of its creations, which is most ancient and most
tenacious of life; capitalism decays with large landed estates and
ground rentals.
This has been the path of suffering and of salvation of humanity, its
Golgotha and its resurrection into an eternal kingdom--from war to
peace, from the hostile splitting up of the hordes to the peaceful
unity of mankind, from brutality to humanity, from the exploiting State
of robbery to the Freemen’s Citizenship.
NOTES
[1] “History is unable to demonstrate any one people, wherein the first
traces of division of labor and of agriculture do not coincide with
such agricultural exploitations, wherein the efforts of labor were
not apportioned to one and the fruits of labor were not appropriated
by some one else, wherein, in other words, the division of labor
had not developed itself as the subjection of one set under the
others.”--Robertus-Jagetzow, _Illumination on the social question_,
second edition. Berlin, 1890, p. 124. (Cf. _Immigration and Labor. The
economic aspects of European Immigration to the United States_, by Dr.
Isaac A. Hourwich. Putnam’s, N. Y., 1912.--_Translator._)
[2] Achelis, _Die Ekstase in ihrer kulturellen Bedeutung_, vol. 1 of
_Kulturprobleme der Gegenwart_, Berlin, 1902.
[3] Grosse, _Formen der Familie_. Freiburg and Leipzig, 1896, p. 39.
[4] Ratzel, _Völkerkunde_. Second Edition. Leipzig and Wien, 1894-5,
II, p. 372.
[5] _Die Soziale Verfassung des Inkareichs._ Stuttgart, 1896, p. 51.
[6] _Siedlung und Agrarwesen der Westgermanen, etc._ Berlin, 1895, I,
p. 273.
[7] l. c. I, p. 138.
[8] Ratzel, l. c. I, p. 702.
[9] Ratzel, l. c. II, p. 555.
[10] Ratzel, l. c. II, p. 555.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account