Now, it would be idle to conceal the fact, that we cannot form any
distinct conception what this spiritual body may be. No such thing has
ever come within the range of our experience. But some particulars we
do know about it, because God has revealed them. And of those, the
principal are specified in this very passage: "_It is sown in
corruption: it is raised in incorruption_." It cannot decay. Eternal
ages will pass over it, and it will remain the same. Again, "_it is
sown in dishonour: it is raised in glory_." There will be no shame
about it, as there will be no sin. Thus much from these words is
undoubted. What else they may imply we cannot say for certain;
probably, unimagined degrees of beauty and radiancy, for so the word
glory as applied to anything material seems to imply. Further: "_it is
sown in weakness: it is raised in power_." That is, I suppose, with
all its faculties wonderfully intensified, and possibly with fresh
faculties granted, which here it never possessed, and the mind of man
could not even imagine. This last also seems to be implied by its
being called a spiritual body. As here it was an animal body, subject
to the mere animal life or soul, hemmed in by the conditions of that
animal life, so there it will be under the dominion of, and suited to
the wants of, man's spirit, the lofty and heavenly part of him.
And if we want to know what this implies, our best guide will be to
contemplate the risen body of our Lord, as we have it presented to us
in the gospel narrative. As He is, so are we in this world in our
essence even now--and as He is so shall we be entirely there. He is
the first-fruits, we follow after as the harvest. What, then, was His
resurrection body? While it was a real body and admitted of being
touched and seen, and had the organs of voice and of hearing, yet it
was not subjected to the usual conditions of matter as to its
locomotion, or its obstruction by intervening objects. It retained the
marks of what had happened before death. In order to convince the
disciples of His identity, our Lord ate and drank before them. We must
therefore infer that these were natural acts of His resurrection body,
and not merely assumed at pleasure.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account