The state of the dead and the destiny of the wickedSmith, Uriah
Religion
The state of the dead and the destiny of the wicked
Smith, Uriah
Annihilationism; Death -- Biblical teaching; Intermediate state; Seventh-Day Adventists -- Doctrinal and controversial works
The notion prevailed in the heathen world that man’s spirit ascended up
to be with the gods, but the spirit of the beast went down to the earth.
It was the old lesson taught by that unreliable character. in Eden, “Ye
shall not surely die,” but “ye shall be as gods.” Solomon contradicts
this by stating the truth in the case, that death reduces man and beast
alike to one common condition. Then he asks, Who knows that the opposite
heathen doctrine is true, that the spirit of man goes up, and that of
the beast down? He had declared that they all went to one place, in
accordance with God’s original sentence, “Thou shalt surely die;” now he
calls for evidence, if there be any, to show that the opposite doctrine
is true. Thus he smites to the ground this pagan notion by putting it to
the proof of its claims, for which no proof exists.
There is another class of expressions respecting the word spirit, which
properly come under consideration at this point. The first is Ps. 31:5,
where David says: “Into thine hand I commit my spirit.” Our Lord used
similar language, perhaps borrowed from this expression of David, when,
expiring on the cross, he said, “Father, into thy hands I commend my
spirit.” Luke 23:46. And Stephen, the martyr, in the same line of
thought, put up this expiring prayer: “Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.”
Acts 7:59. What was it which David and our Lord wished to commit into
the hands of God, and Stephen, into the hands of Christ? A conscious
entity it is claimed, the living and immortal part of man; for nothing
less could properly be committed to God. Thus Mr. Landis (p. 131) asks:
“What was it then? The mere life which passed into nonentity at death?
And can any one suppose they would have commended to God a nonentity?
This would be a shameless trifling with sacred things.” But David, on
one occasion (1 Sam. 26:24), prayed that his life might be much set by,
or be precious, in the eyes of the Lord. That which is precious in his
sight, it seems might very properly be commended to his keeping,
especially when passing, for his sake, out of our immediate control. And
in the very psalm (31) in which he commits his spirit to God, he does it
in view of the fact that his enemies had “devised to take away his
_life_.” Verse 13.
It is a fact that the same or similar acts are spoken of frequently as
done in reference to the life that are said to be done in reference to
the spirit. Can a person commit his spirit to God? So he can commit to
him the preservation of his life. Thus David says, Ps. 64:1: “Preserve
my life.” What! Mr. Landis would exclaim, preserve a nonentity? Jonah
prayed (4:3), “O Lord, take, I beseech thee, my life from me.” Christ
says, John 10:15: “I lay down my life for the sheep;” and in John 13:38,
he asks Peter, “Wilt thou lay down thy life for my sake?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account