The Steam Engine Explained and Illustrated (Seventh Edition): With an Account of Its Invention and Progressive Improvement, and Its Application to Navigation and Railways; Including Also a Memoir of WattLardner, Dionysius
History
The Steam Engine Explained and Illustrated (Seventh Edition): With an Account of Its Invention and Progressive Improvement, and Its Application to Navigation and Railways; Including Also a Memoir of Watt
Lardner, Dionysius
Steam-engines; Watt, James, 1736-1819
When pure hydrogen gas is burned in an atmosphere of common air,
the process which takes place is now known to be nothing more than
the chemical combination of the hydrogen with eight times its own
weight of oxygen taken from the atmosphere, and the product of the
combustion is a quantity of water nine times the weight of the
hydrogen consumed. In the year 1776, Macquer, a well-known chemist
of that day, having held a saucer of white porcelain over a flame
of hydrogen which was burning at the mouth of a bottle, observed
that no smoke was produced and no soot deposited on the saucer. On
the other hand, he found that after the lapse of some time drops
of a clear pellucid liquid were perceptible on the saucer: this
liquid he submitted to analysis, and found it to be pure water.
Macquer mentioned this fact without comment or inference. It did
not occur to him that the water thus produced upon the saucer was
a substance which contained the hydrogen, which disappeared upon
combustion from the bottle.
On the 18th of April, 1781, Mr. Warltire addressed a letter to Dr.
Priestley, dated Birmingham, which letter is published in Dr.
Priestley's _Experiments on Air_, printed at Birmingham in 1781,
in which Warltire informs Priestley that he had fired a mixture of
hydrogen and common air in close glass vessels, and that, although
previously to firing the mixture the vessels were clean and dry, a
dewy deposit was [Pg306] observed afterwards on their sides. In
fact, water was present which was not present before.
The mixture was in this case fired by passing an electric spark
through the vessel; and it is now known that the effect produced
was the combination of the hydrogen, which formed part of the
mixture of airs in the vessel with the oxygen, which also formed
part of the same mixture.
It appears, from expressions in Warltire's letter, that the same
experiment had been previously made by Priestley, and the same
result observed by him.
The inference deduced from this by Warltire, and apparently
acquiesced in by Priestley, was, that whenever hydrogen was fired
in atmospheric air, the moisture, which is always more or less
sustained in the latter, was deposited; but neither of these
chemists perceived the real cause of the production of the water.
In the beginning of 1783, and not later than the 21st of April,
this experiment of Warltire and Priestley was repeated by
Cavendish, with this difference, that, instead of exploding the
mixture of hydrogen and common air, Cavendish exploded a mixture
of hydrogen and oxygen. He observed that water was present after
the explosion, but _inferred nothing_.
In a published paper dated April, 1783, Priestley announced a
further and most important result of his experiments. This was,
that in examining the weight of water produced by the explosion of
a mixture of oxygen and hydrogen, _that weight was found to be
precisely equal to the sum of the weights of the two gases_, which
disappeared in the process.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account