The stereoscope : $b its history, theory, and construction, with its application to the fine and useful arts and to educationBrewster, David
History
The stereoscope : $b its history, theory, and construction, with its application to the fine and useful arts and to education
Brewster, David
Stereoscope
A very remarkable illusion, affecting the apparent position of the
drawings of geometrical solids, was first observed by the late
Professor Neckar, of Geneva, who communicated it to me personally in
1832.[73] “The rhomboid AX,” (Fig. 51,) he says, “is drawn so that the
solid angle A should be seen nearest to the spectator, and the solid
angle X the farthest from him, and that the face ACBD should be the
foremost, while the face XDC is behind. But in looking repeatedly at
the same figure, you will perceive that at times the apparent position
of the rhomboid is so changed that the solid angle X will appear the
nearest, and the solid angle A the farthest, and that the face ACDB
will recede behind the face XDC, which will come forward,—which effect
gives to the whole solid a quite contrary apparent inclination.”
Professor Neckar observed this change “as well with one as with both
eyes,” and he considered it as owing “to an involuntary change in the
adjustment of the eye for obtaining distinct vision. And that whenever
the point of distinct vision on the retina was directed to the angle
A for instance, this angle, seen more distinctly than the other, was
naturally supposed to be nearer and foremost, while the other angles,
seen indistinctly, were supposed to be farther away and behind. The
reverse took place when the point of distinct vision was brought to
bear upon the angle X. What I have said of the solid angles (A and
X) is equally true of the edges, those edges upon which the axis of
the eye, or the central hole of the retina, are directed, will always
appear forward; so that now it seems to me certain that this little, at
first so puzzling, phenomenon depends upon the law of distinct vision.”
[73] See _Edinburgh Philosophical Journal_, November 1832, vol. i. p.
334.
In consequence of completely misunderstanding Mr. Neckar’s explanation
of this illusion, Mr. Wheatstone has pronounced it to be erroneous,
but there can be no doubt of its correctness; and there are various
experiments by which the principle may be illustrated. By hiding with
the finger _one_ of the solid angles, or making it indistinct, by
a piece of dimmed glass, or throwing a slight shadow over it, the
_other_ will appear foremost till the obscuring cause is removed. The
experiment may be still more satisfactorily made by holding above the
rhomboid a piece of finely ground-glass, the ground side being farthest
from the eye, and bringing one edge of it gradually down till it
touches the point A, the other edge being kept at a distance from the
paper. In this way all the lines diverging from A will become dimmer
as they recede from A, and consequently A will appear the most forward
point. A similar result will be obtained by putting a black spot upon
A, which will have the effect of drawing our attention to A rather than
to X.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account