The stereoscope : $b its history, theory, and construction, with its application to the fine and useful arts and to educationBrewster, David
History
The stereoscope : $b its history, theory, and construction, with its application to the fine and useful arts and to education
Brewster, David
Stereoscope
5. Owing to the exposure of the eye and every part of the apparatus
to light, the eye itself is unfitted for distinct vision, and
the binocular pictures become indistinct, especially if they are
Daguerreotypes,[34] by reflecting the light incident from every part of
the room upon their glass or metallic surface.
[34] Mr. Wheatstone himself says, “that it is somewhat difficult to
render the two Daguerreotypes equally visible.”—_Phil. Trans._, 1852,
p. 6.
6. The reflecting stereoscope is inapplicable to the beautiful
binocular slides which are now being taken for the lenticular
stereoscope in every part of the world, and even if we cut in two
those on paper and silver-plate, they would give, in the reflecting
instrument, _converse_ pictures, the right-hand part of the picture
being placed on the left-hand side, and _vice versa_.
7. With transparent binocular slides cut in two, we could obtain
pictures by reflection that are not converse; but in using them, we
would require to have two lights, one opposite each of the pictures,
which can seldom be obtained in daylight, and which it is inconvenient
to have at night.
Owing to these and other causes, the reflecting stereoscope never came
into use, even after photography was capable of supplying binocular
pictures.
As a set-off against these disadvantages, it has been averred that in
the reflecting stereoscope we can use larger pictures, but this, as we
shall shew in a future chapter, is altogether an erroneous assertion.
_Description of the Lenticular Stereoscope._
Having found that the reflecting stereoscope, when intended to produce
accurate results, possessed the defects which I have described, and
was ill fitted for general use, both from its size and its price, it
occurred to me that the union of the dissimilar pictures could be
better effected by means of lenses, and that a considerable magnifying
power would be thus obtained, without any addition to the instrument.
[Illustration: FIG. 11.]
If we suppose A, B, Fig. 11, to be two portraits,—A a portrait of a
gentleman, as seen by the left eye of a person viewing him at the
proper distance and in the best position, and B his portrait as seen
by the right eye, the purpose of the stereoscope is to place these two
pictures, or rather their images, one above the other. The method of
doing this by lenses may be explained, to persons not acquainted with
optics, in the following manner:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account