To be eligible for the office of Committeeman, one must have been a
member for at least five years. The office is and always has been
honorary, but now and again it is suggested that the Committee should
consist, at least partly, of paid experts. Its duties are arduous, and
it frequently has to settle points of the most delicate nature, whereas
it is frequently complained that it does not consist of the best or most
experienced members of the Stock Exchange, who do not see in the honour
and dignity of the position sufficient inducement for the sacrifice of
the time its duties involve. However, generally speaking, the members
are held in high esteem, and seldom, indeed, does it occur that there is
even an expression of disloyalty to the dictates of the Committee even
on the part of those who most desire its reform.
It is questionable whether throughout the whole world any body of men so
constituted is endowed with more important functions or with more
arbitrary power. The Committee can make practically any additions to or
alterations in the code of rules, which was originally based on the deed
of settlement of the Stock Exchange. Those rules have become more
drastic than the law of the land. Practices which would be perfectly
legal, although not very reputable, constitute a contravention of the
rules of the Stock Exchange which would bring dire consequences upon any
member who indulged in them. Members have been expelled the House by the
Committee under the rules for an offence of which the law of the land
would not take cognisance. The rules of the Stock Exchange, as
administered by the Committee, are a code of honour rather than a code
of law.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account