Whilst on the one side of the world the Greeks were falling under the
influence of the nation that had subdued them, on the other they were
assimilating the views of the Oriental nations whom they had subdued by
martial as well as by mental superiority. For two centuries, in
philosophy at least, Greece had held her own against Oriental modes of
thought. Now that her intellectual incapacity continually increased,
those modes of thought gained for themselves a foothold in her
philosophy. Alexandria was the place where the connection of Greece
with the East was first and most completely brought about. In that
centre of commerce for all parts of the globe, East and West entered
into a connection more intimate and more lasting than in any other
centre. Nor was this connection a mere accident of circumstances; it
was also a work of political forecast. From its founder, Ptolemy Soter,
the Ptolemæan dynasty inherited as the principle of government the rule
always to combine what is native with what is foreign, and to clothe
new things in the old and venerable forms of Egyptian custom and
religious ceremony. At Alexandria, accordingly, there arose, towards
the beginning of the first century before Christ, a School calling
itself at first Platonic, afterwards Pythagorean, which later still, in
the shape of Neoplatonism, gained the ascendency over the whole domain
of philosophy. The very fact, however, that such a change in
philosophic views did not appear sooner, is sufficient to show that it
was produced by external circumstances. But notwithstanding external
circumstances it would never have come about had not the intellect of
Greece in the course of its own development been ripe for it.
[(b) Scepticism and Eclecticism.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account