However simple this state of things may be to a purely rational being,
it must be remembered that man is not purely rational. [572] He has,
therefore, irrational as well as rational impulses. [573] He is not
originally virtuous, but he becomes virtuous by overcoming his
emotions. Emotion or passion [574] is a movement of mind contrary to
reason and nature, an impulse transgressing the right mean. [575] The
Peripatetic notion, that certain emotions are in accordance with
nature, was flatly denied by the Stoics. [576] The seat of the
emotions—and, indeed, of all impulses and every activity of the soul
[577]—is man’s reason, the ἡγεμονικόν. [578] Emotion is that state of
the ἡγεμονικόν in which it is hurried into what is contrary to nature
by excess of impulse. Like virtue, emotion is due to a change taking
place simultaneously, not to the effect of a separate extraneous force.
[579] Imagination, therefore, alone calls it into being, as it does
impulse in general. [580] All emotions arise from faults in judgment,
from false notions of good and evil, and may therefore be called, in so
many words, judgments or opinions; [581]—avarice, for instance, is a
wrong opinion as to the value of money, [582] fear is a wrong opinion
as regards future, trouble as regards present ills. [583] Still, as
appears from the general view of the Stoics respecting impulses, [584]
this language does not imply that emotion is only a theoretical
condition. On the contrary, the effects of a faulty imagination—the
feelings and motions of will, to which it gives rise—are expressly
included in its conception; [585] nor is it credible, as Galenus
states, [586] that this was only done by Zeno, and not by Chrysippus.
[587] The Stoics, therefore, notwithstanding their theory of necessity,
did not originally assent to the Socratic dictum, that no one does
wrong voluntarily. [588] Younger members of the School may have used
the dictum as an excuse for human faults, [589] fearing lest, in
allowing freedom to emotions, they should admit that they were morally
admissible and give up the possibility of overcoming them. [590] Nay
more, as all that proceeds from the will and impulse is voluntary,
[591] so too emotions are also in our power; and it is for us to say,
in the case of convictions out of which emotions arise, as in the case
of every other conviction, [592] whether we will yield or withhold
assent. [593] Just as little would they allow that only instruction is
needed in order to overcome emotions; for all emotions arise, as they
say, from lack of self-control, [594] and differ from errors in that
they assert themselves and oppose our better intelligence. [595] How
irregular and irrational impulses arise in reason was a point which the
Stoics never made any serious attempt to explain.
[(b) Varieties of emotion.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account