The stone age in North America, vol. 1 of 2 — John Shaqi
The stone age in North America, vol. 1 of 2Moorehead, Warren K. (Warren King)
History
The stone age in North America, vol. 1 of 2
Moorehead, Warren K. (Warren King)
Indians of North America -- Antiquities; Stone age -- North America
The tendency to explain much of prehistoric times through knowledge of
tribes whose customs are more or less saturated with white man’s
influence seems to me to be unfortunate. To make this clear, let me
present as an illustration the Sun Dance described by George Catlin, and
the Sun Dance described by Dr. Dorsey. More than sixty years intervened
between the two ceremonies. Catlin had no training in science, and
therefore some things must be overlooked in his favor. Yet the dance he
describes is purely aboriginal, or nearly so. Dr. Dorsey, on the other
hand, had all the advantages of scientific training covering many years,
and was able to take advantage of everything that he saw and heard
concerning the ceremony, to compare it with other observances and to
draw learned conclusions. Yet the Sun Dance as seen by Dorsey is totally
different, and is far less interesting and heroic than the same dance
observed by Catlin.
Going back further, we find among the “Jesuit Relations” and narratives
of other explorers, descriptions of certain ceremonies which appear to
retain their aboriginal character. In other words, they were less
European than similar affairs of later dates. Particularly is this true
among the Hurons, Iroquois, Ojibwa, etc. The customs seen among the
Sioux by Hennepin do not exist to-day.
It seems to me that in our haste to make records of tribes that are
passing away, we have published much material that the future
ethnologist will consider less important than similar observations of a
century ago. No matter how much tribes are affected by contact with
civilization, it is well to preserve their records even although the
more able scholars of the future will question some of our observations.
But while admitting the above, I wish to go on record as against the
present tendency, so general, to explain the arts, customs, daily life,
etc., of prehistoric man through our knowledge of a degenerate culture
among modern Indians.
Much of the material presented in this work cannot be explained through
such agencies; for there are hundreds of objects found in graves and
tombs, village-sites and cliff-houses, the like of which have been seen
in use among Indians by no white man whatsoever.
[Illustration:
FIG. 5. (S. 1–1.) First stage of work, after blocking-out. See Fig. 7
for description.
]
Therefore, it appears to me that a classification based on archæological
evidence (as far as possible) is needed, and I have attempted this in
“The Stone Age.”
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account