The stone age in North America, vol. 1 of 2Moorehead, Warren K. (Warren King)
History
The stone age in North America, vol. 1 of 2
Moorehead, Warren K. (Warren King)
Indians of North America -- Antiquities; Stone age -- North America
As to the polish on these things, there are some who contend that it is
due to action of the soil, that a patina or coating of some sort
accumulates. In other words, the polish is said to be a result of
chemical action. Others have thought it due to long-continued use. Some
spades, hoes, and flint celts exhibit this polish, others do not. The
polish appears on specimens which look as if they had been long used.
Yet all specimens showing much use do not exhibit the polish. But the
most significant thing to my mind in favor of the theory that the polish
is due to use, lies in the fact that it is not found on long flakes,
spalls, or blades from quarries where flint suitable for agricultural
implements was taken out and removed. Some of the quarry pits must be
very old, yet polish does not appear on specimens found there. Again, if
polish is due to some elements in the soil of river terraces, then one
would suppose that the whole surfaces of the implements would be
polished. But only the ends are polished, and always the end used in
digging—that is, the edge of the spade.
May 5, 1910, I lectured in Springfield, Illinois. Spades are numerous in
the region lying between Springfield, Illinois, and the Mississippi
River. Therefore, I took occasion to inquire particularly into the
circumstances observed when spades were found, in order to settle this
question as to polish. A number of gentlemen, who have collected several
hundred spades, furnished me with much information with reference to
conditions under which spades are found. Mr. H. M. Braun of East St.
Louis, who lives near the Cahokia group of mounds, has one hundred and
eighty-seven spades and more than a hundred hoes and two or three
hundred flint celts and rough chipped implements in his collection. Mr.
Braun informs me that no one who has found or collected spades could by
any possibility believe that the polish is the result of chemical
action. His reasons are as follows: First, that the polish is found on
spades irrespective of location; that is, a spade may be found in the
Mississippi bottoms, where the soil is very rich, or on the upland, or
near a quarry. And it may or may not be polished. Second, that
spear-heads, arrow-points, and knives of the same material as the spades
do not show the polish. Third, that spades, hoes, and projectile points
of the same material, from the same field, do not exhibit this polish.
It is only the spade which has long been used, the edge of which is
polished. If the polish is due to chemical action, the same polish would
be found on small as well as large objects, or all the objects of a
given locality would present that polish.
In view of these facts, it is beyond question that the polish is due to
use, and it is quite clear that any one who takes the opposite point of
view is not familiar with the locality and conditions under which spades
are found.
[Illustration:
FIG. 168. (_S. about 1–6._)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account